CTRI/2020/03/024160Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Comparison of canine retraction by conventional and corticotomy-facilitated methods: A split mouth clinical study
Monis Raza0 sites0 target enrollmentStarted: TBDLast updated:
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Status
- Not yet recruiting
- Sponsor
Study Overview
Brief Summary
No summary available.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Age range: 18-25 years
- •Cases requiring extraction of upper 1st premolars
- •Full complement of permanent teeth upto 2nd molars.
- •Probing depth less than 4mm in all teeth.
- •Gingival and plaque index less than or equal to 1
Exclusion Criteria
- •Long-term use of antibiotics, phenytoin, cyclosporin, anti-inflammatory drugs, systemic corticosteroids, and calcium channel blockers.
- •Poor oral hygiene
- •Systemic diseases
- •Evidence of bone loss
- •Periodontal disease
- •Probing depth more than 4 mm in any tooth.
Investigators
Similar Trials
Completed
Early Phase 1
A comparison between two methods of canine retractioIRCT201111308257N1Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences24
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of the speed of tooth movement and oral hygiene using zirconia nanoparticle coated appliances for correcting crooked teeth.CTRI/2020/01/022897Sunayna Chowdhary
Completed
Phase 4
a study comparison of time taken for extraction space closure after tooth removal in cases with regular method and following surgical bone reduction.CTRI/2018/07/015041Rashmika Raghavan16
Not yet recruiting
Phase 2
A clinical trial to study the effect of a biological agent(injectable Platelet rich fibrin)on the rate of tooth movement and the pain associated with it.CTRI/2023/11/059480Huma Azad
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
Comparison of Canine Retraction Using Ni-ti Closed-coil Springs Vs Elastomeric Power Chains During Orthodontic TreatmentRoot ResorptionPlaque AccumulationGingivitisNCT06567730Munnal Gulzar46