Does prilocaine provide a quicker recovery than bupivacaine when used in spinal anaesthesia for cervical stitch surgery?
- Conditions
- Elective cervical cerclage in pregnant women at risk of pre-term lossSurgery
- Registration Number
- ISRCTN14374515
- Lead Sponsor
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Ongoing
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 135
Healthy (ASA score 1 or 2) women in the second trimester of pregnancy presenting for elective cervical cerclage under spinal anaesthesia
1. Inability to read or understand the patient information sheet (PIS)
2. Aged <18 years
3. Unable or unwilling to consent to participation
4. Non-elective procedure
5. Serious co-morbidities (ASA score 3 or above)
6. Any contraindication to SAB, e.g. local or generalised infection, active central nervous system disease, coagulation disorders or anti-coagulant medication
7. Any history of allergic reaction to any of the medications in the protocol
8. Concomitant use of class III antiarrhythmics (sulfonamides, antimalarials, sodium nitroprussate, nitroglycerin, other local anaesthetics)
9. Any contraindication to the use of bupivacaine or prilocaine as listed in the SmPCs
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Time taken in minutes from initiation of SAB (time 0) until regression of motor block as assessed using a Bromage score* of I. This will be assessed every 5 minutes in theatre until 20 minutes and then every 15 minutes postoperatively until regression of motor block.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.