Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05267795
NCT05267795CompletedNot Applicable

Reducing Pain Thresholds Using a Focused Music Listening Technique

University of Bergen2 sites in 1 country62 target enrollmentStarted: April 22, 2019Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
62
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Emotional state with regard to felt arousal

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Pain-reducing effects of music listening are well-established, but the effects are small and their clinical relevance questionable. Recent theoretical advances, however, have proposed that synchronizing to music, such as clapping, tapping or dancing, has evolutionarily important social effects that are associated with activation of the endogenous opioid system (EOS; which supports both analgesia and social bonding). Thus, active sensorimotor synchronization to music could have stronger analgesic effects than simply listening to music. However, to the best of the investigators' knowledge, the hypothesis of an EOS activation by sensorimotor synchronization to music has never been investigated. Accordingly, the investigators set up a test with the premise that if sensorimotor synchronization to music indeed activates the EOS, then it should have larger pain-reducing effects than simply listening to music. Using pressure algometry to the fingernails, specific amounts of pain were delivered to healthy adults either during music listening or silence, while either performing an active tapping task or a passive control task. As the dependent variable, perceived pain was rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very little, 5 = medium, 9 = very strong). In addition, to pain ratings, participants provided ratings of their emotional state in terms of pleasantness as well as arousal, and then rated their familiarity with the music (also on scales ranging from 1 to 9). Emotion ratings were obtained to explore whether the mechanisms driving pain-reducing effects of sensorimotor synchronization to music include emotion. At the end of the experiment, participants also rated their preference for the music on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (see Method). Familiarity and preference ratings were obtained to elucidate possible contributions of these factors on pain reduction.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
19 Years to 35 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of a psychiatric or neurological disease
  • History of substance dependence
  • use of any prescription drugs
  • Hearing impairment
  • Musical anhedonia

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Emotional state with regard to felt arousal

Time Frame: 40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very calm, 5 = medium, 9 = very activated)

Perceived Pain

Time Frame: 40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very little, 5 = medium, 9 = very strong)

Emotional state with regard to felt pleasantness

Time Frame: 40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = medium, 9 = very comfortable)

Familiarity with the music excerpt (only during trials with music)

Time Frame: 40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = not at all, 5 = partially known, 9 = well known)

Preference ratings for each musical excerpt

Time Frame: 5 min (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = strongly disliked, 5 = medium, 9 = strongly liked)

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials