MedPath

Reducing Pain With Focused Music Listening

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain
Registration Number
NCT05267795
Lead Sponsor
University of Bergen
Brief Summary

Pain-reducing effects of music listening are well-established, but the effects are small and their clinical relevance questionable. Recent theoretical advances, however, have proposed that synchronizing to music, such as clapping, tapping or dancing, has evolutionarily important social effects that are associated with activation of the endogenous opioid system (EOS; which supports both analgesia and social bonding). Thus, active sensorimotor synchronization to music could have stronger analgesic effects than simply listening to music. However, to the best of the investigators' knowledge, the hypothesis of an EOS activation by sensorimotor synchronization to music has never been investigated. Accordingly, the investigators set up a test with the premise that if sensorimotor synchronization to music indeed activates the EOS, then it should have larger pain-reducing effects than simply listening to music. Using pressure algometry to the fingernails, specific amounts of pain were delivered to healthy adults either during music listening or silence, while either performing an active tapping task or a passive control task. As the dependent variable, perceived pain was rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very little, 5 = medium, 9 = very strong). In addition, to pain ratings, participants provided ratings of their emotional state in terms of pleasantness as well as arousal, and then rated their familiarity with the music (also on scales ranging from 1 to 9). Emotion ratings were obtained to explore whether the mechanisms driving pain-reducing effects of sensorimotor synchronization to music include emotion. At the end of the experiment, participants also rated their preference for the music on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (see Method). Familiarity and preference ratings were obtained to elucidate possible contributions of these factors on pain reduction.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
62
Inclusion Criteria
  • 18 years or older
  • Healthy
Exclusion Criteria
  • History of a psychiatric or neurological disease
  • History of substance dependence
  • use of any prescription drugs
  • Hearing impairment
  • Musical anhedonia

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Emotional state with regard to felt arousal40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very calm, 5 = medium, 9 = very activated)

Perceived Pain40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very little, 5 = medium, 9 = very strong)

Emotional state with regard to felt pleasantness40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = very uncomfortable, 5 = medium, 9 = very comfortable)

Familiarity with the music excerpt (only during trials with music)40 minutes (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = not at all, 5 = partially known, 9 = well known)

Preference ratings for each musical excerpt5 min (duration of time over which each participant is assessed)

rated on a scale ranging from 1 to 9 (1 = strongly disliked, 5 = medium, 9 = strongly liked)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Bergen

🇳🇴

Bergen, Bergen Municipality, Norway

University of Bergen
🇳🇴Bergen, Bergen Municipality, Norway

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.