The Effects and Meaning of a Person-centred and Health-promoting Intervention in Home Care Services
- Conditions
- Staff and Older Persons With Home Care Service
- Interventions
- Other: Care as usualOther: Person-centred and health-promoting home care service
- Registration Number
- NCT02846246
- Lead Sponsor
- Umeå University
- Brief Summary
Current home care service are to a large extent task oriented with a limited focus on care recipient's involvement. Furthermore, studies have shown that low care recipients' involvement might decrease older people's quality of life. Person-centred care focusing on involvement has improved the quality of life and the satisfaction with care for older people in health care and nursing homes but there is a lack of knowledge about the effects and meaning of a person-centred interventions in aged care at home. Present study describes the evaluation of a person-centred and health-promoting intervention.
- Detailed Description
This is a non-randomised controlled trial with a before-after approach. The investigators will include 270 home care recipients \>65 years, 270 family members and 65 staff in intervention group and control group respectively. Participants will be recruited from a municipality in northern Sweden. The intervention involves letting the person and family together with contact nurse prioritise care content and make rearrangements to make sure the home care service maximises the potential to satisfy psychosocial, physical, and functional needs and increasing health. Outcome assessment will focus on; a) quality of life (primary outcomes), thriving and satisfaction with care for older people, b) caregiver strain, informal caregiving engagement and satisfaction with care for relatives, c) job satisfaction and stress for care staff. Evaluation will be performed by questionnaires and interviews.
Person-centred home care services have the potential to improve the recurrently reported sub-standard experiences of home care services and the study result will hopefully lead the way in establish a person-centred and health-promoting model in aged care and living conditions for older people.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 81
Inclusion criteria for care recipients will be:
- persons 65 years or older
- living at home with granted HCS
- have at least two visits per month, and
- be Swedish speaking
Inclusion for family members:
- be defined by the care recipients as his/her family member, and
- Swedish speaking
Inclusion for staff:
- have an employment for more than 6 month in the HCS district at baseline, be a contact staff and
- Swedish speaking
- Care recipients who apply for HCS in the district during the study period will be offered the intervention but not be included in the evaluation
Exclusion Criteria
- No exclusion criteria
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Control Care as usual A usual care paradigm will guide the control units, i.e. a continuation with practice as usual. Intervention Person-centred and health-promoting home care service The experimental group will be introduced to a person-centred care model that involves shared decision making where the person with home care service and family together with contact nurse prioritise care content and make rearrangements to make sure the provided home care service maximises health.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change of Quality of Life assessed with the Nottingham Health Profile scale Baseline, 12 and 24 month follow-up The Nottingham Health Profile scale will be used to assess quality of life. Nottingham health profile includes 38 items in six dimensions: energy level, pain, emotional reaction, sleep, social isolation, and physical abilities. Each item is answered through Yes/No statements and range from best (0) to worst (100) possible score. The Nottingham Health Profile has been found to be sensitive for changes, valid and reliable.
Change of Quality of Life assessed with the EQ-5D Baseline, 12 and 24 month follow-up As a complement, the EQ-5D will also be used to assess quality of life. The EQ-5D consists of two parts, a health state description and a visual analogue scale. The health state description comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has five levels on a Likert-scale: none (0) to extreme (4). The visual analogue scale rates participants overall health between endpoints, worst imaginable health (0) and best imaginable health (100). EQ-5D has been found to be sensitive for changes and valid.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in thriving assessed with the Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale baseline, 12 and 24 month follow-up Thriving will be assessed with The Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale which includes 32 items and consists of five sub-scales: resident attitude towards the place where they are living, quality of the care and care-givers, activities and peer relationships, opportunities to keep in touch with people and places of importance, and qualities in the physical environment. Each item has six answer alternatives on a Likert-scale ranging from No (1) to Yes, I agree completely (6). The Thriving of Older People Assessment Scale has been found to be valid and reliable.
Change in satisfaction with home care service assessed with the Quality of Care from the Patients' Perspective baseline, 12 and 24 month follow-up Satisfaction with home care service will be measured with The Quality of Care from the Patients' Perspective which includes 64 items and consists of four dimensions: medical-technical competence (11 items), physical-technical conditions (10 items), identity-oriented approach (30 items) and social-cultural atmosphere (13 items). Each item should be answered in two ways; perceived reality and subjective importance. Perceived reality range between Not applicable (1) to Fully agree (5) on a five level Likert-scale while the subjective importance range between Of very great importance (1) to of little importance (4). The Quality of Care from the Patients' Perspective has been found to be valid and reliable.