跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02250365
NCT02250365已完成不适用

Electrical Somatosensory Stimulation of the Paretic Upper Limb in Acute Stroke Patients - a Randomized Controlled Study

University of Copenhagen3 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 102 人开始时间: 2014年10月13日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
102
试验地点
3
主要终点
Box and Block Test

研究概览

简要总结

This study evaluates the effect of electrical somatosensory stimulation (ESS) on the restoration of upper limb functioning in acute stroke patients. The effect will be measured at the end of the intervention and six months post-stroke. We expect that ESS facilitates the restoration of upper limb functioning and the brain reorganization following stroke.

详细描述

  1. Introduction

Globally, stroke is ranked as the second leading cause of death and the third largest cause of disease burden. Stroke is associated with tremendous physical, psychological and economical demands on patients, families, the health care system and society at large. The worldwide burden of stroke is expected to increase in the coming years. In the developed countries, this trend is primarily a consequence of the growing older population; age being a major risk factor for stroke. Upper limb paresis is one of the most frequent and persisting impairments following stroke, and represents a major obstacle to regain independence in activities of daily living (ADL). In fact, it has been estimated that about 50% of the stroke survivors will be left with a non-functional arm after completed stroke rehabilitation. In order to minimize the disease burden in stroke survivors, it is of great importance to design and implement effective rehabilitation strategies targeting the paretic upper limb.

Studies have shown that recovery of upper limb functioning (i.e. recovery of impairments and activity limitations, including skills) follows a pattern with a pronounced early post-stroke recovery and a subsequent leveling off already by 6 months post-stroke. In fact, it has been shown that 80% of patients reached a plateau within 3 weeks, and 95% reached a plateau by 9 weeks. It has also been shown that regaining hand dexterity is largely defined within the first 4 weeks after stroke , indicating a critical time window for recovery of upper limb functioning. Therefore rehabilitation efforts in the early post-stroke phase are likely decisive to maximize functional recovery. However, despite the fact that recovery is most likely in the immediate weeks after stroke, there are very few studies investigating the effect of therapeutic interventions in this time period.

Several therapeutic interventions are currently used to try to aid in the recovery of upper limb functioning. There is limited evidence that hands-on therapy, including passive joint mobilization, manual stretching of soft tissue and passive exercises, is effective. Strength training in chronic stroke may reduce motor impairments in patients with mild-moderate paresis, but without any effect on ADL-performance. Likewise, there is limited evidence for the use of mirror therapy, sensorimotor and mental training. The evidence for using orthoses and other supporting devices is inconclusive. Repetitive task-oriented practice, which is probably the widest used intervention in facilitating upper limb recovery after stroke, has demonstrated promising results mostly in chronic stroke when delivered using virtual reality systems and robots, as well as constrained-induced movement therapy. However, these approaches are patient and resource demanding in terms of hours of daily training or expensive technologies. Moreover, it remains unknown if the functional benefits persist at long-term.

Electrical stimulation (ES) is another method that has been used in facilitating the recovery of upper limb functioning following stroke. ES can induce a muscle contraction, or it can be a somatosensory stimulation below the motor threshold. Regardless the type of stimulation, there is some evidence that ES can aid in reducing motor impairments, but the questions regarding the optimal stimulation protocol (e.g. current amplitude, pulse frequency, placement of electrodes, treatment duration), long-term effect and transfer of training effect into ADL remains unanswered. Since this body of evidence is primarily based upon studies conducted on ES in chronic stroke patients, it also remains unknown to what extent ES applied in the acute phase after stroke could affect the recovery of upper limb functioning. Although the vast majority of the studies have focused on ES that induces muscle contraction, it is widely accepted that somatosensory input is required for maintaining normal motor function. Research shows that motor skills acquisition and motor performance are dependent on somatosensory input, and stroke patients with intact somatosensory function experience more satisfactory response to rehabilitation. In healthy persons, the application of electrical somatosensory stimulation (ESS) to peripheral hand nerves, forearm muscles or the whole hand elicits an increase in the cortical excitability of the representations that control the stimulated body parts, and the increased cortical excitability seems to outlast the stimulation period itself. It has been hypothesized that increasing the amount of somatosensory input may enhance the motor recovery of patients following stroke. Recent studies in acute, subacute and mostly chronic stroke patients suggest that a single 2 hours-session of ESS to the peripheral hand nerves leads to transient improvement of pinch force, movement kinematics and upper limb motor skills required for ADL-performance. The higher the current amplitude, the more prominent the effect seems to be. ESS is used in conjunction with motor training in only one of these studies. One study demonstrates that the effect of a single session of ESS is maintained 30 days after cessation of intervention. Interestingly, there is emerging evidence that multiple sessions of ESS to the peripheral hand nerves in conjunction with motor training might improve motor skills of the paretic upper limb in subacute and chronic stroke patients, and these positive results seems to outlast the intervention period. When ESS is delivered in multiple sessions, it is unclear which current amplitude is optimal in subacute stroke patients. ESS of the whole hand using glove electrodes may or may not benefit the motor recovery of the paretic upper limb in chronic stroke patients. Importantly, ESS is passive in nature, causes patients minimal discomfort, has no adverse effects, is relatively cheap and can easily be incorporated in regular practice. Therefore it is valuable to establish the effect of multiple sessions of ESS in the restoration of upper limb functioning in the acute phase of stroke. 2. Purpose of the project

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •admission at the rehabilitation stroke unit of Bispebjerg Hospital, Copenhagen,
  • •diagnosis of acute stroke (ICD 10 code: 163.9, 161.9),
  • •residence in the hospitals' catchment area,
  • •age > 18 years,
  • •modified Rankin Scale score < 5,
  • •ESS can be initiated within 7 days post-stroke,
  • •a subscore < 66 on section A-D of Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity,

排除标准

  • •presence of cognitive dysfunctions or poor communication skills in Danish that limit the ability of providing informed consent,
  • •have participated in other biomedical, intervention studies within the last 3 months,
  • •contraindication to ESS (e.g. pacemaker, significant skin impairment on the paretic arm),
  • •incomplete recovery of the affected upper limb after previous stroke,
  • •patients who - because of placement in an institution, incarceration pursuant to the Psychiatric Act or due to circumstances of employment - are particularly exposed to pressure regarding participation in the project.

研究组 & 干预措施

Continuous, suprasensory ESS

Experimental

干预措施: Continuous, suprasensory ESS (Other)

Intermittent, suprasensory ESS

Active Comparator

干预措施: Intermittent, suprasensory ESS (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Box and Block Test

时间窗: at 6 months post-stroke

Performance test

次要结局

  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper limb section)(at 6 months post-stroke)
  • Hand grip strength(6 months post-stroke)
  • Palmar, lateral and thumb-to-index pinch strength(6 months post-stroke)
  • Modified Rankin Scale(6 months post-stroke)
  • Perceptual threshold of touch(at 6 months post-stroke)
  • Box and Blocks Test(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)
  • Fugl-Meyer Assessment (upper limb section)(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)
  • Hand grip strength(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)
  • Palmar, lateral and thumb-to-index pinch strength(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)
  • Modified Rankin Scale(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)
  • Perceptual threshold of touch(at hospital discharge, but not later than 4 weeks post-stroke)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Emma Ghaziani

PhD student

University of Copenhagen

研究点 (3)

Loading locations...

相似试验