MedPath

Group Treatment for Hoarding Disorder

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Hoarding Disorder
Interventions
Behavioral: Group CBT with IPT
Registration Number
NCT04270825
Lead Sponsor
Florida State University
Brief Summary

This study assesses the effectiveness of a novel group treatment for hoarding disorder.

Detailed Description

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of a novel group treatment for hoarding disorder. Participants will be randomized to receive either treatment as usual (cognitive behavioral therapy: CBT) or treatment as usual augmented by interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT). It is hypothesized that group CBT with IPT will result in greater decreases in hoarding symptoms, as compared to standard group CBT. It is further hypothesized that CBT with IPT will result in greater reductions in object attachment and maladaptive beliefs about relationships with others, as well as greater increases in interpersonal attachment.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria

-Clinical diagnosis of HD

Exclusion Criteria
  • Evidence of a severe mental illness or substance use disorder that would impede the completion of the treatment
  • Current receipt of CBT for HD
  • Initiation of new psychotropic medications for symptoms of HD

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
CBT with IPTGroup CBT with IPTGroup CBT with IPT will consist of 20 weekly two-hour sessions and has been developed for the proposed study based on the protocols for group CBT for HD and group IPT. Treatment includes strategies from CBT, including cognitive restructuring, behavioral exposures, and organizational strategies, as well as strategies from IPT, including role-play, interpersonal skills building, communication analysis, and decision analysis.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in Adult Attachment Scale (AAS)Baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks, 24 weeks

The AAS is a measure of two dimensions proposed to underlie interpersonal attachment security: anxiety and avoidance. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 72.

Changes in Interpersonal Needs Questionnaire (INQ)Baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks, 24 weeks

The INQ is a measure of two interpersonal risk factors, namely perceived burdensomeness and thwarted belongingness, with higher scores indicating higher levels of each construct (i.e., worse outcome). Minimum score is 15 and maximum score is 105.

Changes in Hoarding Rating Scale (HRS)Baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks, 24 weeks

The Hoarding Rating Scale is a commonly used measure of hoarding symptoms in which participants rate the severity of their symptoms. Minimum score is 0 and maximum score is 40. Higher scores indicate more severe/worse symptoms.

Changes in Reciprocal Attachment Questionnaire Adapted (RAQ-A)Baseline, 10 weeks, 20 weeks, 24 weeks

The Reciprocal Attachment Questionnaire Adapted assesses attachment to one's belongings, with higher scores indicating greater attachment to possessions (i.e., worse outcome). Minimum score is 75 and maximum score is 375.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Florida State University

🇺🇸

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath