跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04080999
NCT04080999Unknown不适用

Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (r-TMS) Combined With Conventional Cognitive Treatment on Cognitive-behavioral Symptoms of Left Hemispatial Neglect in Right-stroke Patients Within Three Months Post-onset Compared to Conventional Cognitive Treatment Only: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Azienda Usl di Bologna2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 56 人开始时间: 2018年12月5日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
56
试验地点
2
主要终点
Change from Baseline: behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)

研究概览

简要总结

Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) aiming at assessing the efficacy of a novel rehabilitation protocol, based on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (r- TMS) in combination with a conventional cognitive treatment (CCT). The protocol will be statistically compared to the same CTT administered without the r-TMS in a sample of right-stroke patients (age between 18 and 80 years) with left hemispatial Neglect.

详细描述

BACKGROUND: A frequent and disabling impairment in persons who suffered acquired brain injury after stroke is left hemispatial neglect (LHSN). LHSN is a spatial attentive syndrome characterized by a reduced ability to attend, perceive and consciously represent the left contralesional space, in the absence of a primary sensory deficit. Commonly, the LHSN is due to a lesion on the right inferior parietal cortex and/or on the right fronto-parietal areas. Furthermore in stroke, LHSN is often associated with a mixture of attention and motor deficits leading to complex cognitive and behavioral pictures, which may even interfere with the administration of standard cognitive treatments for LHSN. However, several studies already demonstrated the efficacy of rehabilitation treatments on patients with LHSN, in terms of reducing disability, using various rehabilitative techniques and assessment tests. The rehabilitation techniques can be distinguished, accordingly to the used tools in: cognitive treatments (i.e. visual scanning training) and non-invasive brain stimulation methods (i.e. r-TMS). Conventional cognitive treatments (CCT) for LHSN involve different types of exercises aimed at reducing attentive bias for the ipsilesional space and/or promoting awareness of contralesional space by a continuous training of the patient's spatial exploration abilities. Instead, the TMS is a non-invasive method to modulate excitability of the cerebral cortex. The frequency of TMS pulse determines the type of modulation on the cerebral cortex (i.e. inhibitory <1 Hz; excitatory> 5 Hz). The most used TMS paradigm for the rehabilitation of LHSN is the r-TMS (repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation) and it is based on the model of the inter-hemispheric competition. According to the model, the cerebral areas responsible for spatial orientation are contralateral to the attended hemifield (i.e. the left cerebral areas are responsible for the spatial orientation towards the right hemifield) and exert a reciprocal inter-hemispheric inhibition. The left and right fronto-parietal cortices are part of a intra-hemispheric network, which together with a parietal inter-hemispheric pathway, control the spatial orientation. In particular, a lesion on the right parietal cortex causes disinhibiting of the left parietal cortex and therefore a pathological over-activation of the latter.

According to the model, this left over-activation inhibits the right contralateral neural activity, as an increase of the healthy hemisphere inhibition activity on the damaged hemisphere. For these reasons, in the LHSN, a pathological orientation or pathological attention bias is determined towards the right hemifield after right stroke. Often, the r-TMS treatments aimed at rebalancing the inter-hemispheric competition through a stimulation of the parietal-parietal pathway, in particular inhibiting the intact areas of the left parietal cortex. The results showed significant post-treatment improvements in several neuropsychological and behavioral tests. In particular, a recent study showed how low- frequency r-TMS on the intact contralesional parietal areas reduced the clinical symptoms of LHSN after 10 treatment sessions. Improvements were stable 15 days after the treatment.

Despite evidence of efficacy of single treatment on cognitive symptoms of LHSN, many authors agree that the use of different rehabilitative techniques on the same patient are useful for generalizing clinical improvement and have a greater potential in reducing long-term global disability. However, in the literature, only few study tested effects of combined interventions on LHSN. Here, we aim at assessing the efficacy of a novel rehabilitation protocol, based on r-TMS in combination with a CCT, based on visual scanning training AIMS

To compare the efficacy of a combined r-TMS and CCT intervention aiming at reducing cognitive symptoms of LHSN, in a sample of right Stroke patients with LHSN, within the context of an RCT.

To evaluate the long- term impact of the intervention To evaluate the effect of the intervention on other clinical measures (activity of daily living, attentive and motor functions) and on psychophysiological indices.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 80 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Diagnosis of ischemic stroke in the right middle cerebral artery or right intra-cerebral hemorrhagic stroke, confirmed by brain CT and / or brain MRI;
  • •Diagnosis of LHSN with a specific test (asymmetry score on Bells cancellation test > 3]);
  • •Intra-hospital rehabilitation setting (ordinary hospitalization or DH) or outpatient setting;
  • •Age between 18 and 80 years;
  • •Time between stroke onset and study recruitment three weeks to three months;
  • •Availability to provide informed consent to participation.

排除标准

  • •Clinical instability at recruitment (for example, fever, acute internist conditions, etc.);
  • •History of epilepsy and / or occurrence in the acute phase of at least one seizure crisis
  • •Presence of intracranial metallic implants;
  • •Presence of devices, which could be altered by r-TMS, such as pacemakers, ventricular-peritoneal derivations, Baclofen pump;
  • •Absence of a bone operculum following a neurosurgical operation of decompressive craniotomy;
  • •Presence of behavioral disturbances with inversion of the sleep-wake rhythm
  • •Mono- or bilateral occipital lesions documented on CT and / or history of cortical blindness or visual agnosia;
  • •Concomitant psychiatric disorders and / or history of substance abuse;
  • •State of pregnancy
  • •Inability to execute the following simple order: "Take the pen instead of the key and put it on the sheet"
  • •Severe acoustic deficit not corrected by the use of a hearing aid
  • •Severe reduction of the visus despite the use of eyeglasses
  • •Positive anamnesis of previous cognitive decline

研究组 & 干预措施

r-TMS Group

Experimental

r-TMS Parameters International 10/20 system for the location of the target area (non-lesioned left parietal cortex) 60% Power Frequency: 1 Hz 90 pulse trains with 10 pulses each (total 900 stimuli), resulted in a total stimulation period of 15 minutes.

Visual Scanning Visual-spatial training; Reading and copying training; Copying of line drawings on a dot matrix. Barrage

干预措施: r-TMS (Device)

Sham Group

Sham Comparator

Sham stimulation and Visual scanning training

干预措施: SHAM (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Change from Baseline: behavioral Inattention Test (BIT)

时间窗: up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up

A battery for the assessment of cognitive and behavioral symptoms in LHSN

次要结局

  • Change from Baseline: catherine Bergegò Scale (CBS)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: Trunk Control Test (TCT)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: visual-Attention Bias Index (vABI)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: functional independence measure (FIM)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: Motricity Index (MI)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: test of Attention Performance (TAP/TEA)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)
  • Change from Baseline: Inter Hemispheric transmission Time (IHTT)(up to 21 days post baseline and up to 90 days follow-up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other Gov
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验