A Study of Ixekizumab (LY2439821) Compared to Guselkumab in Participants With Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis
- Conditions
- Plaque Psoriasis
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03573323
- Lead Sponsor
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab to guselkumab in participants with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1027
- Have chronic plaque psoriasis based on a diagnosis for at least 6 months before baseline as determined by the investigator.
- Are a candidate for phototherapy and/or systemic therapy.
- Have both an Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score of ≥3 and a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score ≥12 at screening and at baseline.
- Have ≥10% body surface area (BSA) involvement at screening and baseline.
- If a male, agree to use a reliable method of birth control during the study.
- If female, agree to use highly effective method of contraception.
- Predominant pattern of pustular, erythrodermic, and/or guttate forms of psoriasis.
- Have a history of drug-induced psoriasis.
- Had a clinically significant flare of psoriasis during the 12 weeks before baseline.
- Use of tanning booths for at least 4 weeks before baseline.
- Concurrent or recent use of any biologic agent within the following periods prior to baseline: etanercept <28 days; infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, or alefacept <60 days; golimumab <90 days; rituximab <12 months; secukinumab <5 months; or any other biologic agent (e.g., ustekinumab) <5 half lives.
- Have prior use of IL-23p19 antagonists (e.g., guselkumab, tildrakizumab, risankizumab), or have any condition or contraindication as addressed in the local labeling for guselkumab that would preclude the participant from participating in this protocol.
- Have previously completed or withdrawn from this study, participated in any other study with ixekizumab or guselkumab, have participated in any study investigating IL-23p19 antagonists, or have received treatment with ixekizumab.
- Have previously failed to respond to an IL-17 antagonist, per investigator assessment.
- Have had a live vaccination within 12 weeks of baseline.
- Have a known allergy or hypersensitivity to any biologic therapy.
- Have had any major surgery within 8 weeks of baseline.
- Have had a serious infection, have been hospitalized, or have received intravenous antibiotics for an infection within 12 weeks of baseline.
- Are women who are pregnant, or who are lactating (breast-feeding).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Guselkumab Placebo During the Induction Period, guselkumab 100 mg was given as 1 SC injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. 1 placebo injection (to maintain the blind) was given at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 8, and 10. During the Extension Period, guselkumab 100 mg was given at Week 20. 1 placebo injection (to maintain the blind) was given at Week 16. The Post Treatment Follow Up Period was for safety monitoring following the last treatment period. Ixekizumab Ixekizumab A starting dose of 160 milligram (mg) of ixekizumab was given as 2 subcutaneous (SC) injections at Week 0. During the Induction Period, ixekizumab 80 mg was given every 2 weeks (Q2W) at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12. During the Extension Period, ixekizumab 80 mg was given as 1 SC injection (Q4W) every 4 weeks at Weeks 16 and 20. The Post Treatment Follow Up Period was for safety monitoring following the last treatment period. Guselkumab Guselkumab During the Induction Period, guselkumab 100 mg was given as 1 SC injection at Weeks 0, 4 and 12. 1 placebo injection (to maintain the blind) was given at Weeks 0, 2, 6, 8, and 10. During the Extension Period, guselkumab 100 mg was given at Week 20. 1 placebo injection (to maintain the blind) was given at Week 16. The Post Treatment Follow Up Period was for safety monitoring following the last treatment period.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Improvement From Baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 100) Week 12 The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation (scaling), erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 100 were defined as having an improvement of at least 100% in the PASI scores compared to baseline.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 100 Week 24 The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation (scaling), erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 100 were defined as having an improvement of at least 100% in the PASI scores compared to baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 75 Week 2 The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation (scaling), erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 75 were defined as having an improvement of at least 75% in the PASI scores compared to baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 90 Week 8 The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation (scaling), erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 90 were defined as having an improvement of at least 90% in the PASI scores compared to baseline.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) (0) Week 12 The sPGA is a physician's determination of the participant's psoriasis lesions overall at a given time point categorized by descriptions for induration, erythema, and scaling. For the analysis of responses, the participant's psoriasis is assessed as clear (0), minimal (1), mild (2), moderate (3), severe (4), or very severe (5). An sPGA (0) response was defined as a post-baseline sPGA score of 0.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI 50 Week 1 The PASI combines assessments of the extent of body-surface involvement in 4 anatomical regions (head, trunk, arms, and legs) and the severity of desquamation (scaling), erythema, and plaque induration/infiltration (thickness) in each region, yielding an overall score of 0 for no psoriasis to 72 for the most severe disease. Participants achieving PASI 50 were defined as having an improvement of at least 50% in the PASI scores compared to baseline.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (120)
Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center PC
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of Alabama at Birmingham
🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Alliance Dermatology and Mohs Center
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Perseverance Research Center
🇺🇸Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Johnson Dermatology
🇺🇸Fort Smith, Arkansas, United States
Bakersfield Dermatology and Skin Cancer Medical Group
🇺🇸Bakersfield, California, United States
Wallace Medical Group, Inc.
🇺🇸Beverly Hills, California, United States
California Dermatology and Clinical Research Institute
🇺🇸Encinitas, California, United States
Tien Q. Nguyen, MD inc. DBA First OC Dermatology
🇺🇸Fountain Valley, California, United States
Center for Dermatology Clinical Research, Inc.
🇺🇸Fremont, California, United States
Scroll for more (110 remaining)Total Skin and Beauty Dermatology Center PC🇺🇸Birmingham, Alabama, United States