Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Jugular and Subclavian Approaches
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Catheterization, Central Venous
- Sponsor
- Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
- Enrollment
- 1600
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Immediate complications
- Last Updated
- 9 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheterization is now considered standard of care according to recent clinical evidence, at least considering jugular vein approach. Recent trials suggested that even US-guided subclavian approach could be more effective that landmark technique. However, studies comparing both sites employing US are still lacking.
We, therefore, designed a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to compare these sites, both using US guidance, according to immediate complications following central venous catheterization.
Investigators
Jose Augusto Santos Pellegrini
MD
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •critically ill patients; central venous access indicated.
Exclusion Criteria
- •cardiac arrest; at least one side of each vein available for insertion; pacemaker insertion; pulmonary artery catheter insertion; non-corrected coagulopathy; thrombolytics in the past 24 hours.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Immediate complications
Time Frame: 24 hours