Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02975622
NCT02975622
Unknown
Not Applicable

Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Jugular and Subclavian Approaches

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao1 site in 1 country1,600 target enrollmentAugust 2016

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Catheterization, Central Venous
Sponsor
Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao
Enrollment
1600
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Immediate complications
Last Updated
9 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Ultrasound (US)-guided central venous catheterization is now considered standard of care according to recent clinical evidence, at least considering jugular vein approach. Recent trials suggested that even US-guided subclavian approach could be more effective that landmark technique. However, studies comparing both sites employing US are still lacking.

We, therefore, designed a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial to compare these sites, both using US guidance, according to immediate complications following central venous catheterization.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
August 2016
End Date
December 2020
Last Updated
9 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jose Augusto Santos Pellegrini

MD

Hospital Nossa Senhora da Conceicao

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • critically ill patients; central venous access indicated.

Exclusion Criteria

  • cardiac arrest; at least one side of each vein available for insertion; pacemaker insertion; pulmonary artery catheter insertion; non-corrected coagulopathy; thrombolytics in the past 24 hours.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Immediate complications

Time Frame: 24 hours

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials