Testing a Promising Treatment for Youth Substance Abuse in a Community Setting
- Conditions
- Mental HealthSubstance AbuseDelinquency
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Contingency Management-Family EngagementBehavioral: Treatment as Usual
- Registration Number
- NCT02130479
- Lead Sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Brief Summary
This study aims to address a serious public health problem (i.e., substance abusing adolescents) by testing the effectiveness of a promising substance abuse treatment implemented in a community-based treatment setting (CM-FAM, a family-based contingency management intervention) in comparison to usual treatment services.
- Detailed Description
The overriding purpose of the randomized trial is to examine the effectiveness of a promising and efficient outpatient treatment of adolescent substance abuse delivered in a community-based treatment setting. Although several evidence-based treatments of adolescent substance abuse are emerging, none have experienced widespread adoption in community settings. Thus, as noted by the Institute of Medicine (1998) more than a decade ago and reiterated more recently, a considerable science-service gap exists in regards to treatment of substance abuse in adolescents and adults.
For the proposed study, 204 adolescents meeting diagnostic criteria for substance abuse or dependence will be randomized to either the Contingency Management-Family Engagement (CM-FAM) or Treatment as Usual (TAU) conditions. A multimethod, multirespondent approach will be used to track clinical outcomes at 3, 6, 9, 12, and 18 months post recruitment. Clinical level outcomes pertain to youth substance use, criminal behavior, mental health functioning, and key mediators of serious antisocial behavior in adolescents (e.g., self-control, parental supervision, association with deviant peers). In addition, the incremental cost of CM-FAM will be determined for use in cost effectiveness analyses.
Aim 1: Over an 18-month post-recruitment follow-up, determine the relative effectiveness of CM-FAM vs. TAU in reducing adolescent participants' substance use, criminal activity (including incarceration), and mental health symptoms; and evaluate the cost effectiveness of CM-FAM in achieving these outcomes.
Aim 2: Examine possible moderators and mediators of intervention effectiveness. Moderator variables will include youth demographic and clinical (e.g., co-occurring disorders) characteristics. Mediator variables will include measures of self-control, parenting, and association with deviant peers - constructs targeted by CM-FAM.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 101
- Age of 12-17 years
- Meeting criteria for substance use or abuse.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Contingency Management-Family Engagement Contingency Management-Family Engagement The Contingency Management-Family Engagement or CM-FAM model integrates behavioral (e.g., drug testing linked with consequences) and cognitive behavioral (e.g., functional analyses of drug use, self-management and drug refusal skills training) strategies based on the Community Reinforcement Approach with effective family engagement strategies used in Multisystemic Therapy. Treatment as Usual Treatment as Usual Standard community-based substance abuse treatment services.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in youths' substance abuse frequency as measured by Urine Drug Screens and the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Scale Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline Change in youths' delinquent behavior as measured by Juvenile Justice Archival Records and the Self-Report Delinquency Scale Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline Change in youths' mental health functioning as measured by the Brief Problem Checklist Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in youths' peer relations as measured by the Peer Delinquency and Drug Activities Scales, the Conventional Activities of Peers Scale, and the Bad Friends Scale from the Pittsburgh Youth Study Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline Change in family functioning as measured by the Caregiver Supervision Scale, the Discipline Scale, and the Communication Form from the Pittsburgh Youth Study Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline Change in youths' self-control as measured by the Good Behavioral Self-Control and the Poor Behavioral Regulation Scales Youth baseline, 3, 6, 9, 12, & 18 months post-baseline
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Circle Park Behavioral Health Services
🇺🇸Florence, South Carolina, United States