跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00818324
NCT00818324已完成3 期

Long Term Administration Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Suspension in Dry Eye Patients

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.0 个研究点目标入组 154 人开始时间: 2009年1月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
154
主要终点
Change From Baseline (CFB) in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension during 52 weeks in dry eye patients

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Out patient;
  • Ocular discomfort severity is moderate to severe;
  • Corneal-conjunctival damage is moderate to severe;
  • Unanesthetized Schirmer's test score of 5mm/5minutes or less,or tear breakup time is 5 seconds or less;
  • Best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 or better in both eyes.

排除标准

  • Presence of anterior segment disease or disorder other than that associated with keratoconjunctivitis scicca;
  • Ocular hypertention patient or glaucoma patient with ophthalmic solution;
  • Anticipated use of any topically-instilled ocular medications or patients who cannot discontinue the use during the study;
  • Anticipated use of contact lens during the study;
  • Patient with punctal plug;
  • Any history of ocular surgery within 12 months;
  • Female patients who are pregnant, possibly pregnant or breast feeding;
  • Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or procedual medications;
  • Receipt of any investigational product within 4 months.

研究组 & 干预措施

OPC-12759 Ophthalmic suspension

Experimental

Instillation, 4times/day

干预措施: OPC-12759 Ophthalmic suspension (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Change From Baseline (CFB) in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score

时间窗: Baseline, Week2, Week4, Week28, Week52

FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-15). 0 is better. Baseline scores and those obtained at each examination time point were compared (paired t-test).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry

相似试验