A Clinical Investigation to Assess the Effectiveness of Benzocaine in NRL Condoms in Healthy Adult Men Who Feel They Ejaculate Too Quickly During Vaginal Sex
- Conditions
- Ejaculation Delayed
- Registration Number
- NCT05840172
- Lead Sponsor
- Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Limited
- Brief Summary
The investigation is to evaluate the effectiveness of benzocaine in two NRL condoms compared with a standard NRL control without benzocaine in prolonging time to ejaculation in healthy adult men who feel they ejaculate too quickly during vaginal sex.
- Detailed Description
In this investigation, two NRL condoms with benzocaine paste (Test condom A and Test condom B) will be evaluated against a standard NRL male condom (Control condom) in prolonging time to ejaculation in healthy adult men who feel they ejaculate too quickly during vaginal sex.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 300
- Subjects and their female partners have provided written informed consent.
- Subjects and their female partners between the ages of >= 18 years and =< 60 years.
- Subjects and their female partners must have no health condition in their medical history.
- Subject must be sexually active having regular intercourse.
- Subjects in a stable, monogamous, sexual relationship with the same female partner for more than or equal to 3 months.
- Subject's female partner should already be on an established other highly effective form of non-barrier contraception, unless post-menopausal.
- Subjects reporting a frequency of 'occasionally' to the Sexual Intercourse Self-Estimation Scale.
Main
-
Subject with a pregnant or breastfeeding female partner or the female partner desires to become pregnant during the clinical investigation.
-
Subject or his female partner with a current history of alcohol or drug abuse.
-
Subjects and their female partners with a history of or are suffering from anemia, coronary artery disease, impaired cardiac conduction, pulmonary disease, diabetes, and renal or hepatic disease.
-
Subjects and their female partners with a history of, suspected to have, or be at increased risk of methaemoglobinemia / complications related to ester anaesthetics which could trigger methemoglobinemia.
-
Subject and/or his female partner have a physical or psychological condition that would prevent them from following investigation procedures - including but not limited to the following:
- urological disease,
- ongoing significant psychiatric disorder not controlled by medication
- history of surgery or injury to the pelvis, retroperitoneal surgery, radiotherapy, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, chronic inflammation of the prostate or urethra
- relevant previous or planned genital surgery
- female partner that has been diagnosed with or treated for vaginal complaints (including vaginal dryness)
- any broken skin or wounds in the genital area.
-
Subjects on medication that is contraindicated, which may affect erection.
-
Subject and/or his female partner have any medication which may affect the safety of the subject, including but not limited to benzocaine drug interactions such as cholinesterase inhibitors.
-
Subject and/or his female partner is using or intends to continue to use antibiotics of the sulphonamide type.
-
Subject with premature ejaculation, erectile dysfunction, hypo or hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia, ejaculatory dysfunction, haemorrhagic disorder, hepatitis B or C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection or having had penile implant surgery.
-
Subject that has been diagnosed or received treatment for PE (premature ejaculation).
-
Subjects with confirmed erectile dysfunction, hypo or hyperthyroidism, hypogonadism, hyperprolactinemia.
-
Confirmed diagnosis of male subjects with other forms of ejaculatory dysfunction.
-
Subjects that have had prior genital, prostatic or lower tract surgery.
-
Subjects with haemorrhagic disorder, hepatitis B or C, HIV infection or having had penile implant surgery, at any time in their past.
-
Either partner needed to use condoms for a specific STI protection.
-
Subjects and their female partners who have any relevant history of allergy including local anaesthetics, parabens, PABA, commercial hair dyes, paraphenylenediamine, lubricants and latex.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the effectiveness of benzocaine of the Test Condom A compared with the Control NRL Condom at prolonging time to ejaculation 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) Subjects will be recording the duration (time in minutes:seconds) from vaginal entry to ejaculation for each condom use. The outcome is evaluated by the change from baseline with the Test Condom A compared to the Control NRL Condom, over a 4-week assessment period.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the effectiveness of benzocaine of the Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom at prolonging time to ejaculation 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) Subjects will be recording the duration (time in minutes:seconds) from vaginal entry to ejaculation for each condom use. The outcome is evaluated by the change from baseline with the Test Condom B compared to the Control NRL Condom, over a 4-week assessment period.
Overall proportion of subjects with Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (AE/ADEs) 19 weeks Overall proportion of subjects with Adverse Events/Adverse Device Effects (AE/ADEs) i.e. the occurrence of one of more AE/ADE per subject
To determine the effectiveness of benzocaine of the Test Condom A and Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom at prolonging time to ejaculation for an increase of 2, 3 and 4 minutes 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) Subjects will be recording the duration (time in minutes:seconds) from vaginal entry to ejaculation for each condom use. The outcome is evaluated by the proportion of subjects who achieve an increase of 2, 3 and 4 minutes from baseline in each of the Test Condom A and Test Condom B compared to the Control NRL Condom.
To evaluate the subject's improvement at "lasting longer" for both the Test Condom A and Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) The outcome is assessed by the measure of Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), a subject perceived questionnaire, at the end of a 4-week assessment period when using Test Condom A or Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom. The PGIC is a 7-point response scale (Very much better, Better, Little better, No change, Little worse, Worse, Very much worse).
Subject's experience on the use of each type of condoms [Acceptability and In-Use Tolerability] 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) Acceptability and in-use tolerability as assessed by subject perceived questionnaires
Total clinical failure rate of each type of condoms 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) Number of clinical failure events (clinical slippage or clinical breakage) reported by subjects.
To evaluate the sexual pleasure when using the Test Condom A or Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom 4 weeks for each assessment period (intervention duration) The outcome is assessed by the measure of EMSEX (Event-level Male Sexual) pleasure scale questionnaire, a subject perceived questionnaire, at the end of a 4-week assessment period when using Test Condom A or Test Condom B compared with the Control NRL Condom.
EMSEX pleasure scale is a 11-item scale which assesses sexual pleasure at the event level. For each item, the range spans the entirety of the potential range from 0 (zero) to 100 (one hundred).
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
SGS proderm GmbH
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
SGS proderm GmbH🇩🇪Hamburg, GermanyBritta BadenContact
