MedPath

Handheld Ultrasound-assisted Versus Palpation-guided Labor Combined Spinal-epidural Analgesia

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Labor Analgesia
Interventions
Device: handheld ultrasound-assisted technique
Other: conventional palpation-guided technique
Registration Number
NCT04759547
Lead Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital
Brief Summary

Parturients who need combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour analgesia are randomly assigned to two groups. For the handheld ultrasound-assisted technique group, ultrasound with 3D navigation function is used to determine the needle insertion point and the insertion angle. For the conventional palpation-guided technique group, the interspinous space is detected by palpation. Procedure time, the number of needle passes, the number of needle insertion attempts, success rate, and complications are compared.

Detailed Description

This study aims to determine whether handheld ultrasound-guidance can reduce procedural time for labor combined spinal-epidural analgesia compared with conventional surface landmark-guided technique.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
84
Inclusion Criteria
  • Adult parturients with ASA physical status classification I, II or III requiring a combined spinal-epidural for labor analgesia
Exclusion Criteria
  • Contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (local anesthetics hypersensitivity, coagulopathy, needle insertion site infection, etc.)
  • Difficulty in communication
  • Severe cardiac disease
  • History of spine surgery
  • Anatomical abnormality of the lumbar spine
  • Age under 18

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Handheld ultrasound-assisted techniquehandheld ultrasound-assisted techniqueParticipants will be received labor combined epidural-spinal analgesia using handheld ultrasound
Conventional palpation-guided techniqueconventional palpation-guided techniqueParticipants will be received labor combined epidural-spinal analgesia using conventional landmark-guided technique
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total duration of combined spinal-epidural procedureDuring procedure

Identifying time (time required to complete the preprocedural spinal ultrasound or the assessment by palpation) + Procedural duration (time from the initial Tuohy needle insertion through the skin to the completion of the threading of the epidural catheter)

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Identifying timeDuring procedure

time required to complete the preprocedural spinal ultrasound or the assessment by palpation

Success rate at the first attemptDuring procedure

Success rate at the first attempt

Number of needle insertion attemptsDuring procedure

Number of times the puncture needle was removed from the skin and reinserted

Need to use alternative methodsDuring procedure

Need to use alternative methods for success

Actual needle depth (cm)During procedure

Depth of the needle when the epidural space and dural space are found (cm)

Procedural durationDuring procedure

time from the initial Tuohy needle insertion through the skin to the completion of the threading of the epidural catheter

Success rate at the first needle passDuring procedure

Success rate at the first needle pass

Number of interspace levels at which the insertion was attemptedDuring procedure

Number of interspace levels at which the insertion was attempted

Success rate of dural puncture with needle-through-needle techniqueDuring procedure

Success rate of dural puncture with needle-through-needle technique

Incidence of radicular pain, paresthesia, and bloody tappingDuring procedure

Incidence of radicular pain, paresthesia, and bloody tapping during the procedure

Procedural pain using 11-point verbal rating scaleDuring procedure

Degree of pain during the procedure using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=no pain, 10=most pain imaginable)

Number of passesDuring procedure

Number of times the puncture needle was redirected without removing it from the skin

Procedural discomfort using 11-point verbal rating scaleDuring procedure

Degree of discomfort during the procedure using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=no discomfort, 10=most discomfort imaginable)

Patient satisfaction using 11-point verbal rating scaleFrom the end of the procedure to delivery

Patient satisfaction with the quality of labor analgesia using 11-point verbal rating scale (0=very unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied)

Depth by ultrasoundDuring procedure

Depth to the ligamentum flavum-dura mater complex (LFD) as determined by ultrasound

Failure of labor analgesiaWithin 2 hours after the procedure

The need to reinsert a new epidural catheter due to lack of sufficient analgesia within 2 hours of the primary insertion

Incidence of inadvertent dural punctureDuring procedure

Incidence of inadvertent dural puncture

Incidence of postdural puncture headacheUp to 2 weeks

Incidence of postdural puncture headache

Incidence of back pain postpartum at the site of epidural insertionUp to 2 weeks

Incidence of back pain postpartum at the site of epidural insertion

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Seoul National University Hospital

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath