MedPath

Effects of Remote Exercise on Physical Function in Pre-Frail Older Adults

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Frail Elderly
Registration Number
NCT06672640
Lead Sponsor
Kyungdong University
Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the effects of remote versus in-person exercise interventions on physical function, balance, gait stability, and fall efficacy in pre-frail older adults aged 65 years and above. Participants are randomly assigned to either a remote exercise group, an in-person exercise group, or a control group. The exercise intervention includes balance, strength, and gait training conducted twice weekly for eight weeks. The control group receives educational materials on physical activity. The primary outcome measures include assessments of balance, lower limb strength, gait ability, and fall efficacy. This study seeks to determine if remote exercise is as effective as in-person exercise in enhancing physical function in pre-frail older adults, potentially providing a feasible alternative to traditional in-person programs and addressing barriers such as limited mobility and access to exercise facilities.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 65 years or older
  • Classified as pre-frail based on Fried's frailty criteria (meeting at least two out of five specified indicators)
  • Experienced a fall in the preceding six months or have impaired gait and balance (TUG ≥ 13.5 seconds, BBS ≤ 45)
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 24 or higher
  • Demonstrate the physical capacity to engage in the remote exercise (e.g., ability to stand from a seated position and walk short distances)
Exclusion Criteria
  • Neurological or musculoskeletal conditions that impede physical activity
  • Recent history of severe cardiovascular disease (within the past three months)
  • Inability to commit to continuous participation throughout the study period
  • Any other medical condition that might interfere with the intervention or pose a risk to the participant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Balance abilityBaseline and post-intervention at 8 weeks

Balance performance will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). The TUG measures the time taken for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn around, walk back, and sit down. The BBS is a comprehensive assessment of balance ability during various tasks.

Lower Limb StrengthBaseline and post-intervention at 8 weeks

Lower limb strength will be evaluated using the Five Times Sit-to-Stand Test (FTSTS) and the 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30SCS). The FTSTS measures the time it takes for participants to rise from a chair five times, and the 30SCS measures the number of times participants can rise from a chair in 30 seconds.

Gait AbilityBaseline and post-intervention at 8 weeks

Gait ability will be assessed using the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) and the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT). The DGI assesses participants' ability to modify balance while walking in response to external demands, and the 10MWT measures the time taken to walk 10 meters at a comfortable speed.

Fall EfficacyBaseline and post-intervention at 8 weeks

Fall efficacy will be measured using the Modified Falls Efficacy Scale (MFES). This scale evaluates participants' confidence in performing daily activities without falling, providing an indication of fall-related self-efficacy.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Physical Therapy, Kyungdong University

🇰🇷

Wonju, Gangwon-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath