Evaluation of Effectiveness and Safety of Aortic Valve Replacement in Routine Clinical Practice
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve StenosisAortic Valve Disease
- Interventions
- Procedure: Valve Replacement
- Registration Number
- NCT03453567
- Lead Sponsor
- Seung-Jung Park
- Brief Summary
This study evaluated effectiveness and safety of aortic valve replacement in real-world clinical practice.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 900
- Age 19 and more
- Patient with aortic valve replacement
- Combined with mitral stenosis requiring surgery or aorta stenosis
- Acute bacterial endocarditis within 1 month of valve replacement
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description TAVR Valve Replacement Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Sutureless AVR Valve Replacement Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement Conventional AVR Valve Replacement Conventional Aortic Valve Replacement
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method All-cause death 1 year
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cardiovascular mortality 5 years A. Death due to proximate cardiac cause B. Death caused by noncoronary vascular condition C. All procedure-related/surgery-related death D. All valve-related death E. Sudden or unwitnessed death F. Death of unknown cause
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsNYHA class 30 days and 1 year New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Classification
New onset atrial fibrillation 30 days and 1 year Acute kidney injury 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsTAVR-related complication 5 years A. Conversion to open surgery B. Coronary obstruction C. Mitral valve apparatus damage or dysfunction D. Cardiac tamponade E. Endocarditis F. Valve thrombosis G. Valve malpositioning H. TAV-in-TAV deployment
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsComposite event 5 years A. Device success B. Early safety (30 days)
* Death, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, acute kidney injury, coronary stenosis requiring intervention, significant vascular complication, valve dysfunction requiring intervention C. Clinical efficacy (30 days)
* Death, stroke, deteriorating heart failure or valve function requiring hospitalization, NYHA III or IV dyspnea, valve dysfunction
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsStructural valve deterioration 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsThe change of valve area 30 days and 1 year Aortic valve area measured by echocardiography (mm2)
Myocardial infarction 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsAll stroke and transient ischemic attack 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsPermanent pacemaker insertion 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsProsthetic valve dysfunction 5 years A. Prosthetic aortic valve stenosis B. Prosthesis-patient mismatch C. Prosthetic aortic valve regurgitation
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsBleeding 5 years Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-yearsAccess site complication 5 years Operation site complication Vascular access site and access-related complication
Either Discharge or 30-day, at the earliest time point
1-,6-, and 12-months, and 3-,5-years
Trial Locations
- Locations (3)
Sejong Hospital
🇰🇷Bucheon, Korea, Republic of
Asan Medical Center
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
🇰🇷Yangsan, Korea, Republic of