The Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Dabigatran, Versus Rivaroxaban, and Apixaban Utilized in the Department of Defense Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation Patient Population: A Retrospective Database Analysis
- Conditions
- Atrial Fibrillation
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT03026556
- Lead Sponsor
- Boehringer Ingelheim
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of newly initiated dabigatran among patients diagnosed with non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in comparison to newly initiated rivaroxaban users and newly initiated apixaban users
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 42534
- Age 18+ on index date
- Patients must have been prescribed either dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban identified by pharmacy claim during the study period. The first dispensing date of either study drug will be defined as the index date;
- Patients must be treatment naïve from all OAC use prior to the first NOAC prescription, during study period.
- Patients must have at least 12 months of continuous eligibility prior to the index date;
- Patients must have at least one diagnosis code of atrial fibrillation, defined as International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9-CM diagnosis of 427.31 or ICD-10-CM diagnosis of I48.0, I48.1, I48.2, I48.91 on the index date or during the pre-index period.
Less than 12 months of continuous eligibility in the pre-index period Any claim for OAC drug (oral use only) in the pre-index period Diagnosis of hyperthyroidism during the pre-index period
Having at least one claim for alternative indications; orthopedic procedures, Venous thromboembolism (VTE) (includes deep vein thrombosis (DVT ) & PE)) and the index NOAC prescription at the same time, or, the alternative indication for anticoagulant occurring within 3 months prior to index date in pre-period Having at least one claim with any of the following diagnoses or procedure codes in order to exclude patients with "transient" causes of Afib (3 months prior to index date in pre-period):
- Cardiac surgery
- Pericarditis
- Myocarditis Having at least one medical claim with any of the following diagnoses or procedures codes in order to exclude patients with "valvular" Afib (pre-period):
- Mitral stenosis
- Mitral stenosis with insufficiency
- Mitral valve stenosis and aortic valve stenosis
- Mitral valve stenosis and aortic valve insufficiency
- Diseases of other endocardial structures
- Other and unspecified rheumatic heart diseases
- Open heart valvuloplasty without replacement
- Open and other replacement of unspecified heart valve
- Open and other replacement of aortic valve
- Open and other replacement of mitral valve
- Open and other replacement of pulmonary valve
- Open and other replacement of tricuspid valve
- Heart valve replaced by transplant
- Heart valve replaced by a mechanical device/prosthesis
- Atrioventricular valve repair
- Aortic valve valvuloplasty
- Unlisted procedure, cardiac surgery
- Implantation of catheter-delivered prosthetic aortic heart valve; open thoracic approach
- Transthoracic cardiac exposure (e.g., sternotomy, thoracotomy, subxiphoid) for catheter-delivered aortic valve replacement; without cardiopulmonary bypass
- Transthoracic cardiac exposure (e.g., sternotomy, thoracotomy, subxiphoid) for catheter-delivered aortic valve replacement; with cardiopulmonary bypass
- Replacement, aortic valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass; with prosthetic valve other than homograft or stentless valve
- Valvuloplasty, mitral valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass
- Valvuloplasty, mitral valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass; with prosthetic ring
- Valvuloplasty, mitral valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass; radical reconstruction, with or without ring
- Replacement, mitral valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass
- Implantation of catheter-delivered prosthetic pulmonary valve, endovascular approach
- Replacement, pulmonary valve
- Valvectomy, tricuspid valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass
- Valvuloplasty, tricuspid valve; without ring insertion
- Valvuloplasty, tricuspid valve; with ring insertion
- Replacement, tricuspid valve, with cardiopulmonary bypass
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban Dabigatran vs. Rivaroxaban OAC treatment naïve NVAF patients with at least one prescription claim for dabigatran, rivaroxaban (new oral anticoagulant or NOAC). Dabigatran vs. Apixaban Dabigatran vs. Apixaban OAC treatment naïve NVAF patients with at least one prescription claim for dabigatran, or apixaban (new oral anticoagulant or NOAC).
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Stroke Overall (Hemorrhagic, Ischemic, Uncertain) Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of overall stroke (hemorrhagic, ischemic, uncertain) in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Length of Follow-up: The post-index follow-up period began the day following the NOAC index date and ended on whichever of the following occurred earliest:
1. The day of discontinuation of the index NOAC exposure;
2. The day before a switch to an anticoagulant different from the index exposure;
3. The day before a change in dose for the index NOAC;
4. The end of continuous eligibility of a patient in the health plan (disenrollment);
5. The end of the study observation period; or
6. The date of death of the patient.Overall Major Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of overall Major bleeding (Hemorrhagic Stroke, Major Intracranial Bleeding and Major Extracranial Bleeding) in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came first.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Ischemic Stroke Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of ischemic stroke in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstHemorrhagic Stroke Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of Hemorrhagic stroke in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came first.Major Intracranial Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of major intracranial bleeding in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstMajor Extracranial Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of major extracranial bleeding (Major GI bleeding, Major urogenital bleeding and Major other bleeding) in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstMajor GI Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of major GI bleeding (Upper GI Bleeding and Lower GI Bleeding) in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstMajor Urogenital Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of major urogenital bleeding in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came first.Major Other Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of major other bleeding in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstUpper GI Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of Upper GI Bleeding in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstLower GI Bleeding Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of Lower GI Bleeding in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstTIA Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of transient ischemic attack (TIA) in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came firstAll-cause Mortality Baseline (July 1, 2010) until end of the observation period (June 30, 2016), 6 Years The event rate of all-cause mortality in patients matched on propensity scores without index year.
Event rates were calculated as the total number of patients in each treatment group who had the outcome during follow-up divided by the total person-years at risk in the cohort.
Follow-up time was the time elapsed from the index date to the date of the outcome of interest, disenrollment, end of the observation period (available data), death, discontinuation of the NOAC, or switch to a different NOAC, whichever came first
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Inventiv Health
🇺🇸Princeton, New Jersey, United States