Defining a Standard Set of Value-Based Patient-Centered Outcomes for Endometriosis: A Delphi Study Conducted by the Study Group VALue Based HEalth CaRe In Endometriosis (VALHERIE).
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 56
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Agreement on a list of PROMs and CROMs that are relevant and feasible in endometriosis care by the expert panel
研究概览
简要总结
Endometriosis is a chronic disease that affects one out of 10 women. Endometriosis care is full of variation. Recommendations for optimal management vary between clinician and centers. One way of dealing with this unwanted variation is the shift towards a value -based endometriosis care. Value-based healthcare (VBHC) is a strategy focused on the optimization of the balance between outcomes that are important to patients and cost to achieve these outcomes. To do so, for a given condition it is important to define a standardized set of outcomes metrics allowing quality of care monitoring and comparison in order to optimize clinical practices and patient pathways. A common set of outcomes combining clinical outcomes (Clinical Reported Outcome Measures, CROMs) as well as quality of life and functional recovery indicators through Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Different standardized data sets have already been developed to measure outcomes in other pathologies, however a standardized set of outcome measurements have not yet been determined for endometriosis. The objective of this study is to determine a standard set of outcome measurements for endometriosis.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Profession: gynecologists, radiologist, psychologists, nurses and researchers having an expertise in the field of endometriosis
- •Patient experts having an active role in an endometriosis patient association
排除标准
- •Retirement
结局指标
主要结局
Agreement on a list of PROMs and CROMs that are relevant and feasible in endometriosis care by the expert panel
时间窗: 6 months
Agreement is defined as a consensus of 70% between expert panel members
次要结局
未报告次要终点
