MedPath

Comparison of Patient Comfort After Two Anesthetic Protocols for Injections Into the Eye

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Pain
Interventions
Drug: 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel
Registration Number
NCT01087489
Lead Sponsor
Miami VA Healthcare System
Brief Summary

Patient comfort during and after eye injections will be compared after two numbing (anesthetic) protocols, an eye preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine drops versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel.

Detailed Description

The primary goal of this investigation is to determine the relative comfort of an intravitreal injection (same day and the next day) after a preparation utilizing three cotton swabs soaked in 4% lidocaine versus a preparation using 3.5% lidocaine hydrochloride ophthalmic gel. Based on the available data, the researchers contend that a preparation based on viscous 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel, which coats the surface and remains in contact with the eye longer, may provide greater anesthesia and result in greater patient comfort than the topical 4% lidocaine, which is part of the standard preparation routinely utilized in the ophthalmology department currently. Secondary outcome measure is the intraocular pressure rise after the injection, and the authors will generate prospective data to study whether softening the eye with cotton swabs prior to the injection lowers post-injection pressure spike.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
53
Inclusion Criteria
  • Has required repeat Ranibizumab injections and has had at least 3 injections prior to recruitment
  • Informed consent
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical need for a therapeutic ranibizumab intravitreal injection regardless of the medical indication
  • Able to understand and read English
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnancy (positive pregnancy test)
  • Mental disability
  • Prisoners
  • Patients with fluctuating or impaired decision-making capacity
  • Inability to comply with study or follow-up procedures
  • Previous reaction to the same drug class

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
4% lidocaine4% lidocaineEyes were anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with three cotton swabs soaked in 4% liquid lidocaine applied with moderate pressure to the site of the injection inferotemporally to the limbus. Each participant was assigned to have this prep during one of the consecutive study visits if unilateral or in one eye if patient requires bilateral injections given the same day
3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gelEye was anesthetized with 0.5% proparacaine and then with 3.5% ophthalmic lidocaine gel applied to the surface of the eye. Each participant was randomly assigned to receive this preparation during one of two consecutive intravitreal injection (if unilateral disease) or in one eye if requiring bilateral injections given on the same day.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Discomfort Level and Patient Satisfaction With the Preparation Protocol and Intravitreal Injectionimmediately after injection, 1- hour later, and next day

Discomfort according to the Eye Sensation Scale: 1-none, 2- mild, 3- moderate, 4- severe, 5- extremely severe

Patient satisfaction scale: 1=very unsatisfied, 2=unsatisfied, 3=neutral, 4=satisfied, 5= extremely satisfied

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Intraocular Pressure Change After Intravitreal Injection With Each Anesthetic Method, Results Reported in mmHgimmediately after injection, at 5, 10, 15 minutes

intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured immediately after the injection, and at 5, 10, and 15 minutes after the injection (until it was 30 mmHg or below). Prior to injection IOP and post-injection IOP were compared to find the IOP change after injection.

Presence and Severity of Keratopathy and the Size of Subconjunctival Hemorrhagewithin 10 minutes of the injection

Presence of corneal staining after the injection:

* Quadrants of fluorescein staining: 0 1 2 3 4

* Density of staining: 0- None 1- Mild 2- Moderate 3- Severe 4- corneal abrasion

Size of subconjunctival hemorrhage:

in clock hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Miami Veterans Affairs Medical Center

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath