MedPath

a Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Carbon Dioxide Use in Cardiac Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Carbon Dioxide
Interventions
Procedure: carbon dioxide insufflation
Procedure: No carbon dioxide insufflation
Registration Number
NCT04548687
Lead Sponsor
Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation
Brief Summary

study of the efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide in cardiac surgery: repeated or minimally invasive

Detailed Description

prospective randomized clinical single-center study of the efficacy and safety of using carbon dioxide in deaeration of cardiac cavities during cardiac surgery (repeated interventions and minimally invasive interventions)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  • Planned cardiac surgery on the left heart with limited deaeration: Minimally invasive approach (mininotomy, minimally invasive lateral thoracotomy); Re-intervention
  • Signed informed voluntary consent
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient refusal to participate in any stage of the study
  • History of stroke, transient ischemic attack
  • Hemodynamically significant stenosis of the brachiocephalic arteries (more than 70%)
  • Swelling or thrombosis of the heart
  • LV dysfunction (EF less than 30%)
  • Atherosclerosis of the aorta (atheromatosis)
  • Surgical access conversion

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
carbon dioxide insufflationcarbon dioxide insufflationpatients with planned minimally invasive or repeated cardiac surgery using standard methods of deaeration of cardiac cavities, supplemented with carbon dioxide insufflation during surgery + standard methods of deaeration of cardiac cavities
no carbon dioxideNo carbon dioxide insufflationstandard methods of deaeration of cardiac cavities: manual method, change in body position, through the cannula of the ascending aorta, through the drainage of the left ventricle
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
delirium: CAM-ICU, 3-D CAM7 days after surgery

positive test development of postoperative delirium: Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale, Confusion Assessment Method-Intensive Care Unit (more than one error) - while in the intensive care unit; positive test the 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) defined delirium - while in the ward of the department: The CAM algorithm is considered positive if the following features are present: Feature 1) Acute onset or fluctuating course and Feature 2) Inattention and either Feature 3) Disorganized thinking or Feature 4) Altered level of consciousness.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
deaeration timeintraoperatively

deaeration time according to transesophageal echocardiography data

neurocognitive dysfunction7 days after surgery

development of neurocognitive dysfunction: Montreal Cognitive Assessment - two days before surgery and 7 days after surgery

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

"E.Meshalkin National medical research center" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

🇷🇺

Novosibirsk, Russian Federation

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath