Executive Dysfunction in Restless Legs Syndrome: Clinical Correlates and Outcome After Therapeutic Management
- Conditions
- Restless Legs Syndrome
- Interventions
- Other: PolysomnographyOther: Clinical ScalesOther: Assessment of executive functionsOther: Medical consultation
- Registration Number
- NCT01823354
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Brief Summary
Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a common neurological disorder whose diagnosis is only clinical. The efficacy of dopaminergic agents in improvement of sensorimotor symptoms advance the hypothesis that altered dopaminergic transmission is at the origin of this condition. RLS usually leads to a sleep fragmentation, which induces sometimes severe insomnia most often associated, in clinical practice, to a cognitive complaint (attentional in nature). Executive functions in which dopaminergic transmission is heavily involved refer to a set of complex functions. At least three of them should be considered during their evaluation (ie flexibility, inhibition, and the updating of working memory). These functions are among the targets of the alteration of the quality and quantity of sleep. The few studies that have focused on the study of the integrity of executive functions in RLS have discordant results. The lack of control of key variables in the assessment of executive functioning (ie intellectual performance, depressive symptomatology, generalized slowing in information processing) and the lack of reference in the theoretical approach in executive functions are certainly the two main reasons. Moreover, the question of polysomnographic correlates and the reversibility of these cognitive abnormalities after pharmacological management of RLS remains unanswered today.
The main objective of this study is to compare the executive performance of untreated RLS patients with a group of matched controls.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 176
-
Non-specific criteria (patients and controls)
- Age: 18 to 70 years old
- Fluency in French (written and oral);
- intellectual performance within the normal range (f-NART> 84)
- Subject has signed and returned to the investigator a copy of the signed informed consent; .Affiliated to a social security scheme.
-
Specific criteria patients
- Response to the diagnostic criteria established by the standards of the ICSD-II (2005) and IRLS Study Group (2003) with a severity scale listed at least 21 (score at least severe);
- MPMS score> 10 / h; .ferritin > 50 ng/ml.
-
Exclusion criteria (patients and controls)
- Taking any psychotropic medication within 15 days prior to polysomnography (except for patients on dopamine agonist reassessed at 6 months follow-up);
- Pregnant and lactating women;
- Pneumologic affection
- Night shift;
- Apnea-hypopnea index > 15; .Major subjects protected by the law, under guardianship.
-
Exclusion criteria (controls)
- Neurological or psychiatric current and/or past;
- MPMS score> 10 / h; .Subject currently participating in another clinical research project prohibiting joint participation in another biomedical research, or who are in a period of exclusion or who have already received the maximum legal compensation for stresses in the year.
-
Exclusion criteria (patients)
- Presence of other neurological conditions present and / or a psychiatric disorder (other than a mood disorder and / or anxiety); .RLS patients previously treated with a dopamine agonist who has not stopped treatment at least 15 days before the start of the study.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients Clinical Scales Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales, Medical consultation Patients Polysomnography Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales, Medical consultation Controls Medical consultation Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales Medical consultation Controls Polysomnography Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales Medical consultation Patients Assessment of executive functions Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales, Medical consultation Patients Medical consultation Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales, Medical consultation Controls Clinical Scales Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales Medical consultation Controls Assessment of executive functions Polysomnography, Assessment of executive functions, Clinical scales Medical consultation
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of the Verbal fluency test between untreated RLS patients and control subjects Day 0 Number of correct words (without repetitions and intrusions) provided by the subject in each condition.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Assessment of executive functions (composite criteria) Day 180 * Trail Making Test GREFEX
* Sroop Test GREFEX
* Wisconsin Card Sorting Test
* Phasic alertness TAP
* Working memory TAP
* Flexibility TAP
* Go / no go TAP
* Score of Reached Executive SeverityChange of the sleep fragmentation at day 180 (composite criteria) Day 0 and Day 180 The severity of sleep fragmentation is determined by these parameters:
* Total time asleep in minutes.
* Percentage of sleep efficiency.
* Ensure intra-sleep.
* Index of arousals / hour of sleep.
* Index of periodic movements per hour of sleep associated with arousal
* Index of arousal.Change of the Verbal fluency test after dopamin agonist treatment in RLS patients Day 0 and Day 180 Number of correct words (without repetitions and intrusions) provided by the subject in each condition.
Change of the Clinical Scales at day 180 (composite criteria) Day 0 and day180 * Index of Restless Legs Syndrome Severity
* Index of insomnia Severity
* Beck's Inventory of Depression
* Anxiety Inventory: State-Trait, form Y
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
UH Montpellier
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
UH Nîmes
🇫🇷Nîmes, France