Test-retest Reliability of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test in Participants With Hypersomnolence
- Conditions
- Disorders of Excessive Somnolence
- Registration Number
- NCT07120061
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Brief Summary
This study will provide the first measurement of the test-retest reliability of the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) with a prospective multicenter design. A high level of reliability will reinforce the place of the MWT as an essential tool to respond to the medical and legal worldwide issue of the driving risk related to hypersomnolence. This would legitimize its place as a medico-legal examination in France and promote its diffusion in other countries. A low level of reliability will call into question the place of the MWT in the management of participants with hypersomnolence. Bordeaux University Hospital is the sponsor of this research. This research will be conducted with the support of Société Française de Recherche en Médecine du Sommeil.
- Detailed Description
Hypersomnolence is a frequent and disabling symptom that has an impact on an individual's daytime functioning and particularly on driving, increasing the risk of traffic accidents related to sleepiness. Objective markers for assessing hypersomnolence are particularly important to overcome reporting bias since it is listed as a factor of temporary medical incompatibility to obtain or maintain a driving license in several countries, including France. According to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine (AASM), the MWT is the most relevant test for medico-legal assessments of fitness to drive.
Several experimental and epidemiological studies have shown that mean sleep latency at the MWT is a valid biomarker for assessing driving risk. However, there is currently no data on the test-retest reliability of the MWT from one day to the next. This is all the more important given the implications on the driving ability, and the variability associated with good participant compliance (good sleep hygiene the night before the test, absence of stimulation during the test). This study will use a factorial design to allow for stratified analyses with strong power (50 participants with Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), including 25 before/without treatment and 25 after/under treatment, and 25 participants with narcolepsy type 1 ,(after/under treatment) and 25 healthy volunteers. All participants will undergo an inclusion visit (V0) and two MWT (V1 and V2) separated by less than 28 days. All MWT will be twice blinded analyzed by a single expert to minimize variability of interpretation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Not provided
- Comorbid sleep disorders associated with excessive daytime sleepiness (e.g., OSAS and narcolepsy)
- Severe conditions endangering life in the short term
- Participant with cardiovascular, neurological, psychiatric, respiratory, infectious, endocrine, or systematic pathology, which is not stabilized and may require hospitalization or a modification of therapy during the duration of the study
- Introduction or change in dosage of a psychotropic medication in the previous year which may modify the level of arousal in the previous year and modify the MWT results
- Shift or night workers
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- Participants under curatorship or guardianship
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Mean sleep latency of the MWT v2 (up to 90 days after V0) Sleep latency value in the wakefulness maintenance test.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Bordeaux Sleepiness Scale at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported traffic accidents or near-misses related to sleepiness and sleepiness at the wheel.
4-items questionnaire. Total score of 8 points. If the score is 3 or higher, the prediction of the risk of a sleep-related accident or near miss is defined as positive.Chronotype at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported chronotype (reduced Morningness-Eveningness Questionnaire) It consists of 5 questions, each with a scoring system ranging from 1 to 5 points (depending on the answers), giving a total score ranging from 4 to 25.
The lower the score, the more "evening" the chronotype; the higher the score, the more "morning" the chronotype.Sleepiness (1) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported sleepiness using :
- the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, 8-items, the total score ranges from 0 (normal sleepiness) to 24 (pathological sleepiness)Sleepiness (2) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported sleepiness using :
- the Hypersomnia Severity Index, 9-items, the total score ranges from 0 (no hypersomnia) to 36 (Very severe Hypersomnia)Sleepiness (3) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported sleepiness using :
- the Insomnia Severity Index, 7 items, the total score ranges from 0 (no insomnia) to 28 (Severe insomnia)Sleepiness (4) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported sleepiness using :
- Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, 10 items. The total score ranges from 5 ( Significant alteration) to 20 (no alteration)Quality of life (1) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self reported quality of life with :
- EQ-5D, total score from 0 (Worst possible health) to 100 ( Best possible health)Quality of life (2) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self reported quality of life with :
- Fatigue Severity Scale, 9 items, total score from 1 (Absence or low fatigue) to 7( Severe fatigue, with marked repercussions)Quality of life (3) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self reported quality of life with :
- Toronto Hospital Alertness Test, 10 items, total score from 0 (Impaired alertness (low alert)) to 50 (Good vigilance/sufficient alertness)Sleep behaviors at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Objective sleep behaviors (sleep duration, sleep regularity, sleep timing, using the 2-weeks actigraphy and sleep diary).
Appropriate disorder (1) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported severity scale for appropriate disorder using :
* The Patient Reported Apnea Questionnaire, 16 items (from 0 to 5), The higher the score, the greater the negative impact of Obstructive Sleep Apnea.
* The Narcolepsy Severity Scale, 15 items, the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.Appropriate disorder (2) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Self-reported severity scale for appropriate disorder using :
- The Narcolepsy Severity Scale, 15 items, the higher the score, the more severe the symptoms.Mental complaints (1) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Mental complaints using :
- The Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, 7 items, total score from 0 (no anxiety) to 21(severe anxiety)Mental complaints (2) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Mental complaints using :
- The Perceived Stress Scale, 10 items, total score from 0 (Low stress) to 40 (High stress)Mental complaints (3) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Mental complaints using :
- The Psychological-Physical-Pain Visual Analogue Scale, 3 items from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximal pain)Mental complaints (4) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Mental complaints using :
- The Adult Self-Report Scale, 18 items, total score from 0(no symptom) to 72 (very frequent/severe symptoms)Mental complaints (5) at Baseline (day 0), v1 (up to 88 days after day 0) and v2 (up to 90 days after day 0) Mental complaints using :
- The Participant Health Questionnaire-9, 9 items, total score from 0(no depression) to 27 (severe depression)
Trial Locations
- Locations (4)
CHU de Bordeaux
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
CHU de Montpellier
🇫🇷Montpellier, France
APHP - Hôtel-Dieu
🇫🇷Paris, France
APHP - la Pitié-Salpêtrière
🇫🇷Paris, France
CHU de Bordeaux🇫🇷Bordeaux, FranceJulien COELHO, DrContact05 57 82 08 95julien.coelho@chu-bordeaux.frNathalie HEYVANGContactnathalie.heyvang@chu-bordeaux.frJean-Arthur MICOULAUD-FRANCHI, PrPrincipal InvestigatorJulien COLHO, DrSub Investigator