"Short Transverse" Versus Conventional "Hockey Stick" Incision in Kidney Transplantation
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score
研究概览
简要总结
Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection).
Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.
The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Age equal or over 18 years
- •Sole kidney transplantation
- •Consent form
排除标准
- 未提供
研究组 & 干预措施
1
Short Transverse Incision
干预措施: Short Transverse Incision (Procedure)
2
Hockey Stick Incision
干预措施: Hockey Stick Incision (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score
时间窗: preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative
次要结局
- Quality of Life by SF (Short Form) 36(preoperative, day 7, week 4, month 6 postoperative)
- Warm ischemic time(intraoperative)
- Operation time(intraoperative)
- Postoperative pain measured by VAS (visual analog scale) and amount of analgesia(day 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 postoperative)
- Surgical complications(day 7, week 4, month 6, month 12 postoperative)