MedPath

The Application and Evaluation of eHealth Literacy (eHL) Concept

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Chronic Kidney Diseases
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Cardiovascular Diseases
Interventions
Behavioral: experience learning programs of eHealth care
Registration Number
NCT05180604
Lead Sponsor
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Brief Summary

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of experience learning program of eHealth care to improve the chronic patients' eHL in engaging with the eHealth care system on the indicators on eHealth literacy, patient health engagement, e-Health usage status among Chronic disease patients included type 2 diabetes patients, Chronic kidney disease, and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Detailed Description

Chronic diseases are irreversible that incurs considerable medical and economic costs. Even if the government and medical health care system make an effort to improve care and recommend e-health care, the incidence and prevalence rates of chronic diseases have not decreased but increased, and participants have even become the main cause of kidney disease. Technology and daily life has become more inseparable, which also led to the change of the traditional face to face health care model. The chronic disease care is gradually transitioning into the smart eHealth care era, patients are in need of learning how to face innovative ways of using care and resources. eHealth literacy (eHL)is the essential element that determines if patient can adapt to the rapidly changing health care system.

Due to the disciplinary integration of medical and technology, eHealth care provides continuous care for patients. But, it is still necessary to return to patient-centered care thinking and improving patients' knowledge and ability to use eHealth care technology. This can be applied to disease care, and implemented for daily self-health management. Therefore, this study explores the effects of intervention and the learning process and experience of patients through an experience learning program of eHealth care.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
92
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosed as a type 2 diabetes patients, Chronic kidney disease, and Cardiovascular Diseases more than three months.
  • At least 20 years old, with clear consciousness and able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
  • Possess a mobile phone or tablet with internet capabilities.
  • Consent to participate in this research and be willing to sign a consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Suffering from serious diseases, such as: general paralysis, mental disorders, cognitive function abnormalities, etc.
  • Those who cannot communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.
  • Those who refuse to participate in this research.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
experience learning programs of eHealth careexperience learning programs of eHealth carePatients in the experimental group received 6 sections of activities.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The Patient Health Engagement score after intervention at 3 monthsThe post-test 2 is completed after intervention at 3 months

The scale is thought of as a self-administering tool by the patient in order to diagnose his/ her This scale has a total of 5 questions. The higher the number, the higher the patient engagement it is.

The Patient Health Engagement score after intervention at 6 monthsThe post-test 3 is completed after intervention at 6 months

The scale is thought of as a self-administering tool by the patient in order to diagnose his/ her This scale has a total of 5 questions. The higher the number, the higher the patient engagement it is.

The eHealth Literacy Questionnaire scores at the end of interventionThe post-test 1 is completed at the end of the 6 weeks intervention

Evaluate the patient's eHL level, including 7 dimensions (1) Using technology to process health information, (2) Understanding of health concepts and languages, (3)Ability to actively engage with digital service, (4)Feel safe and in control, (5) Motivated to engage with digital service, (6) Access to digital services that work (7)Digital services that suit individual. The higher the score, the better the eHL.

The eHealth Literacy Questionnaire scores after intervention at 6 monthsThe post-test 3 is completed after intervention at 6 months

Evaluate the patient's eHL level, including 7 dimensions (1) Using technology to process health information, (2) Understanding of health concepts and languages, (3)Ability to actively engage with digital service, (4)Feel safe and in control, (5) Motivated to engage with digital service, (6) Access to digital services that work (7)Digital services that suit individual. The higher the score, the better the eHL.

Baseline of The acceptance of eHealth care scoresThe pretest is completed when the patients agrees to join the intervention.

The scale was developed base on Technology Acceptance Model to assess patients' behaviors intention of using the eHealth device

The acceptance of eHealth care scores after intervention at 3 monthsThe post-test 2 is completed after intervention at 3 months

The scale was developed base on Technology Acceptance Model to assess patients' behaviors intention of using the eHealth device

Baseline of Health Technology Usage SoreThe pretest is completed when the patients agrees to join the intervention.

Use self-developed structured questionnaires to investigate the types of health technology use and monitoring items. Use types include computer or network systems, mobile apps, health monitoring systems or wearable devices (such as pedometers, smart bracelets, heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, Blood glucose meter, blood pressure meter, blood glucose meter or weight scale, etc.) or other, monitoring items include blood pressure, blood sugar, weight, diet, sleep, heart rate, steps or other health data. The higher the number, the more items are monitored, the total score The higher the level, the better the use of health technology.

The Health Technology Usage Sore after intervention at 6 monthsThe post-test 3 is completed after intervention at 6 months

Use self-developed structured questionnaires to investigate the types of health technology use and monitoring items. Use types include computer or network systems, mobile apps, health monitoring systems or wearable devices (such as pedometers, smart bracelets, heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, Blood glucose meter, blood pressure meter, blood glucose meter or weight scale, etc.) or other, monitoring items include blood pressure, blood sugar, weight, diet, sleep, heart rate, steps or other health data. The higher the number, the more items are monitored, the total score The higher the level, the better the use of health technology.

The Health Technology Usage Sore at the end of interventionThe post-test 1 is completed at the end of the 6 weeks intervention

Use self-developed structured questionnaires to investigate the types of health technology use and monitoring items. Use types include computer or network systems, mobile apps, health monitoring systems or wearable devices (such as pedometers, smart bracelets, heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, Blood glucose meter, blood pressure meter, blood glucose meter or weight scale, etc.) or other, monitoring items include blood pressure, blood sugar, weight, diet, sleep, heart rate, steps or other health data. The higher the number, the more items are monitored, the total score The higher the level, the better the use of health technology.

Baseline of eHealth Literacy Questionnaire scoresThe pretest is completed when the patients agrees to join the intervention.

Evaluate the patient's eHL level, including 7 dimensions (1) Using technology to process health information, (2) Understanding of health concepts and languages, (3)Ability to actively engage with digital service, (4)Feel safe and in control, (5) Motivated to engage with digital service, (6) Access to digital services that work (7)Digital services that suit individual. The higher the score, the better the eHL.

The eHealth Literacy Questionnaire scores after intervention at 3 monthsThe post-test 2 is completed after intervention at 3 months

Evaluate the patient's eHL level, including 7 dimensions (1) Using technology to process health information, (2) Understanding of health concepts and languages, (3)Ability to actively engage with digital service, (4)Feel safe and in control, (5) Motivated to engage with digital service, (6) Access to digital services that work (7)Digital services that suit individual. The higher the score, the better the eHL.

The acceptance of eHealth care scores at the end of interventionThe post-test 1 is completed at the end of the 6 weeks intervention

The scale was developed base on Technology Acceptance Model to assess patients' behaviors intention of using the eHealth device

The acceptance of eHealth care scores after intervention at 6 monthsThe post-test 3 is completed after intervention at 6 months

The scale was developed base on Technology Acceptance Model to assess patients' behaviors intention of using the eHealth device

The Health Technology Usage Sore after intervention at 3 monthsThe post-test 2 is completed after intervention at 3 months

Use self-developed structured questionnaires to investigate the types of health technology use and monitoring items. Use types include computer or network systems, mobile apps, health monitoring systems or wearable devices (such as pedometers, smart bracelets, heart rate monitors, blood pressure monitors, Blood glucose meter, blood pressure meter, blood glucose meter or weight scale, etc.) or other, monitoring items include blood pressure, blood sugar, weight, diet, sleep, heart rate, steps or other health data. The higher the number, the more items are monitored, the total score The higher the level, the better the use of health technology.

Baseline of Patient Health Engagement scoreThe pretest is completed when the patients agrees to join the intervention.

The scale is thought of as a self-administering tool by the patient in order to diagnose his/ her This scale has a total of 5 questions. The higher the number, the higher the patient engagement it is.

The Patient Health Engagement score at the end of the interventionThe post-test 1 is completed at the end of the 6 weeks intervention

The scale is thought of as a self-administering tool by the patient in order to diagnose his/ her This scale has a total of 5 questions. The higher the number, the higher the patient engagement it is.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
The change in Triglycerides level at the end of the interventionTo collect two-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention and the end of the six weeks intervention

The health outcome indicator of management of lipid

The change Trajectory of Triglycerides level from baseline to after the intervention at 3 , 6 and 12 monthsTo collect four-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention, the end of the 6 weeks intervention, after the intervention at three months, after the intervention at six months, and after the intervention at twelve months.

The health outcome indicator of management of lipid

The change in Cholesterol level at the end of the interventionTo collect two-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention and the end of the 6 weeks intervention

The health outcome indicator of management of lipid

The change Trajectory of Cholesterol level from baseline to after the intervention at 3, 6 and 12 monthsTo collect two-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention, the end of the 6 weeks intervention, after the intervention at three months, after the intervention at six months, and after the intervention at twelve months.

The health outcome indicator of management of lipid

The change in renal function level at the end of the interventionTo collect two-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention and the end of the the 6 weeks intervention

The health outcome indicator of management of renal disease by using the estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGRF) .

The change Trajectory of HbA1C level from baseline to after the intervention at 3, 6, and 12 monthsTo collect four-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention, the end of the 6 weeks intervention, after the intervention at three months, after the intervention at six months, and after the intervention at twelve months

The health outcome indicator of management of diabetes

The change Trajectory of renal function level from baseline to after intervention at 6 months and 1 yearTo collect three-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention, the end of the 6 weeks intervention, and after intervention at six months and 1 year

The health outcome indicator of management of renal disease by using the estimated Glomerular filtration rate(eGRF) .

The change in HbA1C level at the end of the interventionTo collect two-time point data by chart review. Those were before the intervention and the end of the the 6 weeks intervention

The health outcome indicator of management of diabetes

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

National Yang Ming University

🇨🇳

Taipei City, Taiwan

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath