Comparison of two different implant placement techniques
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2020/04/024591
- Lead Sponsor
- VSPM Dental College and Research Centre
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 46
1.Systemically healthy patients of at least 21 years of age.
2.Patient with healthy and stable soft tissue architecture
3.Sites at which minimum torque of 35 Ncm is obtained at the time of implant insertion.
4.Co-operative, motivated and hygiene conscious patients
For Delayed Implants
1.Partially edentulous requiring dental implant/s in posterior maxilla or mandible
2.Adequate volume of native or grafted bone to accommodate dental implants
For Immediate Implants
1.Tooth/teeth with Grade I or II mobility required to be extracted.
2.Root stumps
3.Tooth with endodontic failure or non restorable caries
4.Tooth with acute periapical pathology like vertical root fracture
5.Chronic periodontal disease with hopeless prognosis
1. General contraindications to implant surgery.
2. Subjected to irradiation in the head and neck area, within the last 6 months.
3. Treated or under treatment with intravenous amino-bisphosphonates.
4. Smokers or patients with poor oral hygiene.
5. Patients with para-functional habits.
6. Pregnant or lactating females.
7. An acute or chronic infection at the site intended for implant placement.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Minimum hard and soft tissue changes occurs in delayed implants as compared to immediate implants using flapless approach when evaluated clinically and radiographically.Timepoint: 3,6,9,12 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The clinical parameters like probing pocket depth varies between both the treatment modalitiesTimepoint: 3,6,9,12 months