Comparison of Postoperative Results of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy in Patients With Uterine Prolapse.
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ Prolapse
- Sponsor
- Diyarbakir Women's and Children's Diseases Hospital
- Enrollment
- 120
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 5 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.) We will evaluate Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative System (POP-Q), Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), routine gynecologic USG, failure, complication, operation time .
Investigators
Şerif AKSİN
Medical Doctor
Diyarbakir Women's and Children's Diseases Hospital
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •patients requiring surgical treatment for the symptomatic stage of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ 2
Exclusion Criteria
- •Age \> 70 years
- •Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- •Pregnancy
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score
Time Frame: 12 months after intervention
a system for assessing the degree of prolapse of pelvic organs
Secondary Outcomes
- Change from baseline Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire (PQoL) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse(12 months after intervention)
- Change from baseline Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse(12 months after intervention)
- Change from baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain(12 months after intervention)
- Failure (%)(12 months after intervention)
- Complications(12 months after intervention)