Comparison of Laparoscopic Sacrohysteropexy, Modified Laparoscopic Lateral Suspension and Laparoscopic Pectopexy.
- Conditions
- Pelvic Organ ProlapseLaparoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT04178083
- Lead Sponsor
- Diyarbakir Women's and Children's Diseases Hospital
- Brief Summary
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
- Detailed Description
The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy, laparoscopic modified lateral suspens9ion and laparoscopic pectopexy between January 2017 and December 2019 in our clinic.(Patients with at least 12 months of the date of surgery will be called for examination.)
We will evaluate Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantitative System (POP-Q), Prolapse Quality of Life Questionnaire (PQoL), Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS), Visual Analogue Score (VAS), routine gynecologic USG, failure, complication, operation time .
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 120
- patients requiring surgical treatment for the symptomatic stage of pelvic organ prolapse ≥ 2
- Age > 70 years
- Severe cardiovascular or respiratory disease
- Pregnancy
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score 12 months after intervention a system for assessing the degree of prolapse of pelvic organs
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change from baseline Prolapse Quality of Life questionnaire (PQoL) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse 12 months after intervention The survey includes 20 questions grouped in chapters (areas) related to a specific aspect of quality of life
Change from baseline Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score (POP-SS) to measure quality of life according to pelvic organ prolapse 12 months after intervention measures the effect of changes in pelvic organ prolapse on quality of life
Change from baseline Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain 12 months after intervention Participant describes the pain related to the mesh
Failure (%) 12 months after intervention Recurrence rate
Complications 12 months after intervention İnjury
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Diyarbakır Women's and Children's Hospital
🇹🇷Diyarbakır, Turkey
Diyarbakır Women's and Children's Hospital🇹🇷Diyarbakır, Turkey