Nilotinib vs Imatinib in Adult Patients With Philadelphia (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase (CML-CP)
- Registration Number
- NCT00519090
- Lead Sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Brief Summary
In this study, the efficacy and safety of nilotinib 400 mg twice daily, will be compared with imatinib 400 mg twice daily in patients with a suboptimal response to imatinib for their Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP).
- Detailed Description
This trial was to evaluate the CCyR rate at 12 months of nilotinib therapy when compared to imatinib treatment in patients with suboptimal response to imatinib. The patients were stratified by prior duration of initial imatinib treatment, and were randomized to receive either 400 mg/twice daily of continuous nilotinib or imatinib treatment. The first stratum patients were treated with imatinib = 6 to \< 12 months and having at least a minimal cytogenetic, but no partial cytogenetic response; and the second stratum patients were treated with imatinib = 12 months to \< 18 months and having partial cytogenetic response (PCyR), but no CCyR.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 6
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Nilotinib (AMN107) Nilotinib (AMN107) - Imatinib Imatinib -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Complete Cytogenetic Response Rate(CCyR) in Patients Who Had a Suboptimal Cytogenetic Response on Imatinib 12 months Due to early termination of the trial, the number of patients was too small and imbalanced and therefore analysis was not performed.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Durable Complete Cytogenetic Response Rate 24 months Due to early termination of the trial, the number of patients was too small and imbalanced and therefore analysis was not performed.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (30)
Arizona Cancer Center
🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States
Southern California Permanente Medical Group
🇺🇸San Diego, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Hayward Medical Center
🇺🇸Hayward, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Oakland Medical Center
🇺🇸Oakland, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/South San Francisco Medical Center
🇺🇸S. San Francisco, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Sacramento Medical Center
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group
🇺🇸San Jose, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Santa Clara Medical Office
🇺🇸Santa Clara, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Vallejo Medical Center
🇺🇸Vallejo, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Medical Group/Walnut Creek Medical Center
🇺🇸Walnut Creek, California, United States
Scroll for more (20 remaining)Arizona Cancer Center🇺🇸Tucson, Arizona, United States