跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02071953
NCT02071953已完成不适用

Clinical Evaluation of an Experimental Universal Adhesive Used With and Without Phosphoric Acid Pretreatment in Posterior Composite Resin Restorations

Dentsply International0 个研究点目标入组 37 人开始时间: 2012年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
37
主要终点
Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)

研究概览

简要总结

The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.

详细描述

The intent of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of an experimental dental bonding agent (adhesive) for use with dental restorative composites with and without pretreatment of the tooth dentin and enamel using phosphoric acid etching.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients in need of Class I and Class II restorations in premolars and molars.

排除标准

  • Patients with fewer than 20 teeth
  • Patients exhibiting poor oral hygiene or uncontrolled periodontal disease
  • Pregnant women or lactating mothers
  • Patients with known allergies to HEMA or resin-based materials
  • Patients with medical conditions that would contraindicate dental treatment
  • Patients with xerostomia

结局指标

主要结局

Presence of Secondary Dental Caries (Cavities)

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

Change in presence of secondary dental caries will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= No caries present. D= Caries present associated with the restoration. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: Secondary caries is a categorical, dichotomous variable, i.e. there is caries or not. This was assessed clinically and radiographically by a trained professional (dentist).

Surface Condition of Restoration

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

The change in surface condition of restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Restoration is continuous with existing anatomic form. B= Restoration is discontinuous with existing anatomic form but missing material is not sufficient to expose dentin or lining. C= Sufficient restorative material is lost to expose dentin. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.

Marginal Integrity

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

Change in marginal integrity will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Explorer does not catch or slight catch with no visible crevice. B= Explorer catches and crevice is visible but no exposure of dentin or base. C= Explorer penetrates crevice and defect extended to amelo-dentinal junction. D= Restoration is fractured, mobile, or missing in part or in toto. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.

Post-operative Sensitivity

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

Patient will be interviewed to assess post-operative sensitivity according to the following criteria: A= No sensitivity. B= Mild sensitivity. C= Moderate sensitivity with no restoration replacement required. D= Sever sensitivity. Replacement of restoration is required. Tooth sensitivity will be assessed at baseline and each follow-up appointment using cold thermal test (Endo-Ice, Hygienic) and Electric Pulp Test (EPT) when indicated.

Marginal Discoloration

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months. Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

Marginal discoloration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= No visual evidence of marginal discoloration. Bravo= Marginal discoloration present but has not penetrated in a pulpal direction. Charlie= Marginal discoloration has penetrated in a pulpal direction. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.

Gingival Inflammation Index

时间窗: 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

Patient's gingiva will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: 0 = Normal gingiva. 1. = Mild inflammation, slight change in color, slight edema, no bleeding upon probing. 2. = Moderate inflammation, redness; edema and glazing; bleeding upon palpation. 3. = Severe inflammation, marked redness and edema, ulceration, tendency to spontaneous bleeding. * As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed. Note: At 6 months data was not reported. At Baseline, all patients presented a score of 0. Any patient with a score greater than zero would have been excluded at baseline. Patients who received Class I restorations were not assessed as these restorations are limited to the chewing surface and not related to the health of gums.

Color Match

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

The color match will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* for matching with adjacent teeth and stability of color matching over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: Alpha= Restoration matches adjacent tooth structure in shade and/or translucency. Bravo= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is within normal range of tooth shades. Charlie= Mismatch in shade and/or translucency is outside normal range of tooth shades. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.

Presence of Restoration Fractures (Localized or Bulk)

时间窗: Baseline, 6 months, 18 months; Note: The 36 month evaluation was an option in the protocol at the time of investigation initiation. The study was concluded at 18 months. Thus 36 month data does not exist.

The restoration will be assessed clinically according to Ryge (1973)\* for presence of fractures over time. Assessments will be done to the following criteria: A= Smooth restoration surface with no irregularities. B= Slightly rough or pitted restoration surface. Can be refinished. C= Deeply pitted or grooved (not related to anatomy) restoration finish. Can not be refinished. D= Restoration surface is fractured or flaking. \*As per the Investigation Protocol, United States Public Health Service (USPHS) direct evaluation procedures were conducted using modified methods reported by Ryge in 1973. As described by Ryge in 1973, the term "clinical assessment" means a visual examination by a dentist, using a mouth mirror, an explorer, and supplementary lighting as needed.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

相似试验

Comparative Study of Experimental Dental Adhesive... | 临床试验