Comparing Handheld Doppler and Electrocardiogram Accuracy in Neonatal Heart Rate Assessment During Resuscitatio
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: P84- Other problems with newborn
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/066779
- Lead Sponsor
- Sri Ramchandra institute of higher education and research
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Moderate to Late Preterm: 32 0/7–36 6/7 and Term Newborns: 37 0/7–41 6/7 weeks of gestational age undergoing caesarean deliveries at SRMC
Exclusion Criteria
Skin lesions pose difficulty attaching ECG leads and placing the Doppler probe.
If not able to record heart rate with ECG or pulse-oximeter.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To determine the accuracy of early detection of heart rate using handheld Doppler in comparison to ECGTimepoint: baseline at time of birth to 120 seconds for normal and 300 seconds for babies requiring resucitation
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Determine the average time it takes to achieve a neonatal heart rate through different methods.Timepoint: baseline at time of birth to 120 seconds for normal & 300 seconds for babies requiring resucitation;Evaluate the effectiveness & practicality of using a handheld Doppler for neonatal heart rate measurement in comparison to ECG & Pulse oximetryTimepoint: baseline heart rate measurements done over a period of 120 seconds in normal babies & 300 seconds for babies requiring resuscitation using Bland-Altman analysis for comparison;Record the time needed for applying various approaches in heart rate assessmentTimepoint: from time of application to time of first initial record of values displayed measured in seconds