We is the new I - How an integrative team strengthening intervention can improve cohesio
Not Applicable
Recruiting
- Conditions
- Cohesion & implied motives
- Registration Number
- DRKS00031667
- Lead Sponsor
- Privat
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 120
Inclusion Criteria
Teams with regular training sessions (at least two) and competitive matches
Performance class: regional upto state class
Exclusion Criteria
not interested in participating
Cohesion according to MAKO-02 over 6.4
Drop-Out: Coach change
Study & Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Cohesion (as a numerical value with a maximum of 7.0)<br><br>Determination according to the MAKO-02 cohesion questionnaire according to Lau<br>Measurement of cohesion at a total of 8 measurement times:<br>- Baseline survey at the start of the study (probably early May)<br>- every three weeks: renewed measurement by the Mako-02 (total of 6 measurement times)<br>- At the end of the study (after 18 weeks): cohesion checked again by MAKO-02<br><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Expression of implied motives (measurement at the beginning and end of the study using the multi-motive grid according to Schmalt et al.)<br><br>Subdivision of the results into the 6 implicit motive expressions<br>Hope for success / fear of failure (achievement motive)<br>Hope of joining / fear of rejection (joining motive)<br>Hope for control / fear of losing control (power motive)<br><br>Performance at the end of the season (comparing the table placement at the beginning and at the end of the study)<br><br>