Music Listening for Mental Health Recovery After Stroke
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Registration Number
- NCT07127159
- Lead Sponsor
- New York University
- Brief Summary
This study aims to explore whether listening to music intentionally can support the mental health of people recovering from a stroke. The question the investigators aim to answer is: Can intentional music listening improve emotional well-being in stroke survivors? And if so, what kinds of changes might music listening induce in mental health, thinking and memory (cognition), and brain activity? Participants will be randomly assigned to listen to either music or an audiobook for one hour each day, at home, for four weeks. Participants will also attend four in-person sessions with the researchers: at the start of the study (baseline), just before the listening period begins, after the four weeks are complete, and at a follow-up. During these visits, researchers will gather information about participants' mood and mental health (via questionnaires), assess memory and attention (via cognitive tasks), and use MRI scans to look at brain activity.
- Detailed Description
This is a feasibility clinical trial of a remotely delivered music listening intervention for individuals with chronic stroke, incorporating objective tracking of music exposure and multimodal assessments of mental health, cognitive, neural, and physiological changes.
Specifically, this is a parallel-group randomized controlled feasibility trial enrolling patients with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomized to either an intentional music listening (IML) group or an active control group that listens to audiobooks. The study includes a 4-week pre-intervention period during which no treatment is administered; this phase is designed to assess the stability of outcome measures. Following this, participants will engage in 1-hour daily listening sessions over a 4-week intervention period. All listening activity (i.e., track identity, duration, and engagement) will be continuously tracked using custom open-source software, providing a measure of treatment dose. Behavioral outcomes related to mental health will be assessed at baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3-month follow-up. Multimodal biomarkers (functional and structural MRI, electrodermal activity, and heart rate) will be collected pre- and post-intervention. The primary objective is to establish feasibility, defined by rates of retention and adherence, fidelity, feasibility, acceptability, and burden. Secondary outcomes include recruitment and randomization rates. This trial will provide essential data to inform the design of future large-scale clinical studies of IML for post-stroke mental health recovery.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Participants aged 50 to 90
- Confirmed diagnosis of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke occurring at least six months prior to enrollment.
- Significant hearing loss, defined by a score >26 on the Hearing Handicap Inventory for the Elderly Screening (HHIE-S; Ventry and Weinstein, 1982)
- Contraindications for MRI
- Significant cognitive impairment, defined as a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., 2005) score below 22 (unless the lower score is attributable to expressive aphasia)
- Specific musical anhedonia, defined as a score below 60 on the Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ; Mas-Herrero et al., 2013)
- Amusia, defined as a score below 70% on the Montreal Battery of Evaluation of Amusia (MBEA; Peretz et al., 2003).
- Participants will not be excluded if currently taking medications that may affect brain function (e.g., antidepressants) or if engaged in other complementary therapies (e.g., mindfulness, yoga). However, participants will be instructed not to initiate any new medications or therapies during the study period. Participants who begin a new treatment during the study will be excluded from the analysis.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Burden (Completion of evaluation sessions) From baseline to follow-up (3 months post-intervention) Burden associated with each of the four evaluation sessions will be assessed. The outcome measure will include the proportion of patients who complete evaluations at each time point, with a target of at least 80% completion.
Burden Ratings From baseline to follow-up (3 months post-intervention) Investigators will assess the perceived burden of participants by collecting at each evaluation session burden ratings. Participants will rate sessions as "not burdensome," "partially burdensome," or "very burdensome". The goal is for at least 80% of patients to rate the evaluations at each time point as "not burdensome. Burden ratings will be collected at 4 time points (baseline, pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up).
Patient acceptability From beginning to end of the intervention (4 weeks) After each listening session, participants will rate the session as "not acceptable," "partially acceptable," or "fully acceptable." The goal is for at least 80% of sessions to be rated as fully acceptable.
Retention and Adherence From beginning to end of the intervention (4 weeks) Proportion of enrolled and randomized participants who complete the IML/Audiobook sessions. At least 80% of randomized patients complete at least 80% of the IML/Audiobook sessions.
Feasibility Ratings From beginning to the end of the intervention (4 weeks) Each listening session will be rated by the study team member leading the session as "not feasible," "partially feasible," or "fully feasible." The primary feasibility outcome measure is the proportion of sessions rated "fully feasible," with a target threshold of 80%.
Fidelity From beginning to the end of the intervention (4 weeks) Fidelity will be measured as the the proportion of listening sessions delivered according to the protocol; video calls with patients will be recorded and a team member who was not present during the call will review the recordings and score the session as "delivered according to protocol" or "not delivered according to protocol". Benchmark for success: At least 80% of all sessions delivered according to the protocol.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Recruitment Baseline Recruitment will be measured by the number of participants successfully enrolled per month. The target benchmark is a minimum of 2 participants enrolled each month.
Randomization (Enrolment) Baseline Randomization will be evaluated based on the proportion of screened participants who are successfully enrolled. The target benchmarks is for at least 30% of screened participants to be enrolled.
Randomization (Participation) Baseline, pre-intervention, and intervention Randomization will be evaluated based on the proportion of enrolled participants who complete both the baseline and pre-intervention evaluations and attend at least one IML or Audiobook session. The target benchmark is for at least 80% of enrolled participants to reach this initial level of study engagement.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
New York University
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
New York University🇺🇸New York, New York, United StatesPablo Ripolles, PhDPrincipal Investigator