Comparison of external oblique intercostal plane block and transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 入组人数
- 60
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1. To compare postoperative analgesia using Numeric Rating Scale between EOIC plane block versus TAP block in adult patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
研究概览
简要总结
A 60-patient quasi-experimental study comparing EOIC vs TAP block after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, evaluating postoperative pain scores, duration of analgesia, rescue analgesic consumption, and sensory block coverage.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18.00 Year(s) 至 65.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Posted for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under GA ASA physical status 1&2.
排除标准
- •Infection at injection site Coagulopathy BMI more than 35 History of allergy to local anaesthetics.
结局指标
主要结局
1. To compare postoperative analgesia using Numeric Rating Scale between EOIC plane block versus TAP block in adult patient undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy
时间窗: 0 is on arrival to PACU | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 12 hours post surgery
2. To assess the duration of postoperative analgesia in terms of time to first rescue analgesia
时间窗: 0 is on arrival to PACU | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 12 hours post surgery
after surgery
时间窗: 0 is on arrival to PACU | 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 12 hours post surgery
次要结局
- SECONDARY OBJECTIVE(1. To compare the postoperative rescue analgesic requirements over a 24-hour period)
研究者
Sneha P V
Government Medical College, Kozhikode