MedPath

A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Imsidolimab (ANB019) in Adults With Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Phase 2
Completed
Conditions
Generalized Pustular Psoriasis
Interventions
Biological: Imsidolimab
Registration Number
NCT03619902
Lead Sponsor
AnaptysBio, Inc.
Brief Summary

The main objectives of this study are to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of imsidolimab in adults with active GPP.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
8
Inclusion Criteria
  • Diagnosis of active GPP
  • Japanese Dermatology Association (JDA) severity index total score of at least 6 and erythema with pustules accounting for at least 10% of body surface area or a moderate severity score on Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA)
  • Must be candidates for systemic therapy or phototherapy
Read More
Exclusion Criteria
  • Erythrodermic, guttate psoriasis, drug induced GPP
  • Any other ongoing inflammatory disease that interfere with the Investigator's ability to evaluate the subject's response to therapy
  • History of recurrent or chronic infection
  • ongoing use of psoriasis prohibited medication

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ImsidolimabImsidolimabParticipants received imsidolimab 750 mg intravenously (IV) on Day 1 followed by administration of 3 doses of subcutaneous (SC) imsidolimab 100 mg on Days 29, 57, and 85.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline in Body Surface Area of Erythema With Pustules at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Response on the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) ScaleWeek 4 and Week 16

Clinical response was defined as "Very much improved," "Much Improved," or "Minimally Improved" on the CGI scale according to the Modified Japanese Dermatological Association Severity Index (JDA-SI) total score.

The JDA-SI includes assessment of skin lesions (area of erythema with pustules, area of erythema total, and area of edema) and fever, white blood cell count, C-reactive protein and serum albumin levels. The total score ranges from 0 to 17 (severe).

CGI was assessed based on the JDA-SI according to the following:

* Very Much Improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 3 or \> points;

* Much improved: Reduction in JDA-SI total score by 1 or 2 points;

* Minimally improved: No change in JDA-SI total score and area of erythema with pustules reduced by \<20% or clinically meaningful improvement in at least 1 other component of the modified JDA-SI.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent Change From Baseline in Modified Japanese Dermatological Association - Severity Index (mJDA-SI) Total Skin Lesions Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline, Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16

The area of erythema with pustules, area of total erythema and area of edema were assessed by the Investigator and scored from 0 to 3 on the following scale:

* 0: 0% body surface area (BSA) affected;

* 1: \> 0%, \< 10% BSA affected;

* 2: ≥ 10%, \< 50% BSA affected;

* 3: ≥ 50% BSA affected.

The JDA-SI Total Skin Lesions Score is the sum of the area of erythema with pustules score, area of total erythema score and area of edema score and ranges between 0 and 9 (worst). A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Baseline and Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16

The DLQI is a 10-item questionnaire that asks participants to evaluate the degree that their skin problem has affected their quality of life in the last week in the following 6 aspects: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work or school activities, personal relationships and treatment related feelings. Participants answer the 10 questions on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much). The DLQI is calculated by summing the scores of the 10 questions, resulting in a maximum of 30 and a minimum of 0 with higher scores indicating more impaired quality of life. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement.

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician's Global Assessment (GPPPGA) Score of 0 or 1 at Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16Week 1, Week 4, and Week 16

The GPPPGA scale was used to assess the impact and severity of GPP on the following scale:

* 0: Clear (normal skin or post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation, no visible pustules, no scaling or crusting).

* 1: Almost clear (faint, diffuse pink or slight red erythema, low density occasional small discrete pustules (noncoalescent), superficial focal scaling or crusting restricted to periphery of lesions).

* 2: Mild (light red erythema, moderate density grouped discrete small pustules (noncoalescent), predominantly fine scaling or crusting).

* 3: Moderate (bright red erythema, high density pustules with some coalescence, moderate scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions).

* 4: Severe (deep fiery red erythema, very high density pustules with pustular lakes, severe scaling or crusting covering most or all lesions).

Trial Locations

Locations (13)

Site 102

🇺🇸

Encino, California, United States

Site 105

🇺🇸

Largo, Florida, United States

Site 104

🇺🇸

Miami, Florida, United States

Site 100

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site 501

🇰🇷

Seoul, Korea, Republic of

Site 101

🇺🇸

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site 301

🇵🇱

Rzeszów, Poland

Site 304

🇵🇱

Olsztyn, Poland

Site 303

🇵🇱

Łódź, Poland

Site 302

🇵🇱

Łódź, Poland

Site 201

🇬🇧

London, United Kingdom

Site 203

🇬🇧

Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom

Site 202

🇬🇧

Salford, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath