A comparison of two different scoring systems to see which one is better at predicting the possibility of heart related complications after skull base surgery.
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: Q273- Arteriovenous malformation (peripheral)Health Condition 2: M01X- Direct infection of joint in infectious and parasitic diseases classified elsewhereHealth Condition 3: C800- Disseminated malignant neoplasm, unspecifiedHealth Condition 4: C709- Malignant neoplasm of meninges, unspecifiedHealth Condition 5: B998- Other infectious diseaseHealth Condition 6: Q048- Other specified congenital malformations of brain
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2024/05/067390
- Lead Sponsor
- Rohan Jacob Titus
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
All patients in my cohort that have undergone base of skull surgery and have an RCRI score more than 1
Exclusion Criteria
All patients in my cohort that have an RCRI score less than 1.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage risk of MACE i.e major adverse cardiac events, in the perioperative period in both the RCRI scoring system and the ACS-NSQIP scoring systemTimepoint: Prior to surgery, at 30 days post-operatively.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method not applicableTimepoint: not applicable