Anatomical sNuffbox for Coronary anGiography and IntervEntions
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery DiseaseVascular Access Complication
- Interventions
- Procedure: Coronary angiography +/- percutaneous coronary intervention
- Registration Number
- NCT03986151
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital of Patras
- Brief Summary
This randomized, single-center, prospective study seeks to compare the conventional radial approach with the recently described distal radial approach (anatomical snuffbox) concerning the patency of the radial artery in patients subjected to coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention.
- Detailed Description
Transradial approach has become the standard approach for coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The current ESC/EACTS guidelines of myocardial revascularization support using radial approach (RA) rather than femoral approach (FA) if the operators are experts for RA. Recently, an alternative transradial access has been suggested at the anatomical snuffbox, with potential additional benefits including a reduction in radial artery occlusion rate (which allows reintervention through the same access site and potential use as a graft), a decrease in other local vascular complications, shorter hemostasis duration, patients' intra and post procedural comfort and shorter recovery time. However, the feasibility of PCI via snuffbox approach is still concerned due to the lack of data. Therefore, the aim of the study is to compare the two approaches concerning the patency of the radial artery ≥30 days after the intervention with Doppler in a randomized way. Due to the anastomosis of the distal radial artery with the superficial palmar arch, even in case of total radial artery occlusion within the anatomical snuffbox, the antegrade blood flow may be preserved and, therefore, decreased incidents of radial artery occlusion are expected in the right distal radial artery approach group. The mean diameter of radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox is 2.4 mm, whereas the mean diameter of the radial artery at the forearm is 2.7 mm, and this could potentially contribute to shorter hemostasis duration.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1042
- Indication for coronary angiography
- Informed consent
- Non palpable right radial artery
- Prior complicated right transradial intervention (radial artery dissection, perforation, occlusion)
- Prior CABG
- STEMI
- Hemodynamic instability
- Anatomical restrictions (fistula, etc)
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Distal radial access Coronary angiography +/- percutaneous coronary intervention - Conventional radial access Coronary angiography +/- percutaneous coronary intervention -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Rate of right radial artery occlusion ≥30 days after CAG or PCI
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total Procedure Time Immediately post-procedurally Rate of successful insertion of the sheath Immediately post-procedurally Duration of sheath insertion procedure Immediately post-procedurally Rate of successful completion of percutaneous coronary intervention Immediately post-procedurally Pain associated with the procedure: Pain scale 0-10 1 hour Pain scale 0-10. A visual anlog pain scale 0-10 will be shown to the patient post-precedurally. 0=no pain, 10=worst pain. Patient will be asked to report the severity of the pain associated with the procedure.
Rate of successful completion of coronary angiography Immediately post-procedurally Total Fluoroscopy time Immediately post-procedurally Rate of distal radial artery occlusion ≥30 days after CAG or PCI Total Contrast volume Immediately post-procedurally Postprocedural Hematoma (modified EASY class) 3 hours Total Radiation Dose Immediately post-procedurally Time required for hemostasis 1-6 hours
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
University Hospital of Patras
🇬🇷Patras, Achaia, Greece