MedPath

EUS BD vs ERCP TP for Pancreatic Cancer

Not Applicable
Conditions
Biliary Duct Obstruction
Periampullary Cancer
Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer
Periampullary Carcinoma Non-Resectable
Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
Biliary Tract Neoplasms
Interventions
Procedure: ERCP
Procedure: Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary Drainage
Registration Number
NCT03063554
Lead Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Brief Summary

This Endoscopic Ultrasound guided Biliary Drainage (EUS-BD) vs. Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP-TP) trial (BILPAL) is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not traditional ERCP biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstruction in bile duct due to unresectable pancreatic head or periampullary tumor.

Detailed Description

Obstructive jaundice is the most common symptom in patients with periampullary cancer and cancer of the pancreatic head. For patients with unresectable tumors, palliation of malignant obstructive is traditionally achieved using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with transpapillary (TP) stent placement. Data show that ERCP is equivalent to surgery with regards to relief of jaundice. Self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) offer prolonged palliation compared to large-bore (10Fr) plastic stents. However, it is believed that gastric outlet obstruction occurs more commonly in patients who have received SEMS for palliation of MOJ. In addition, ERCP is associated with adverse events including pancreatitis, post-sphincterotomy bleeding, and perforation.

More recently endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided biliary drainage has been described for biliary drainage in patients with malignant distal bile duct obstruction. Thus far it has been used as a rescue approach when traditional ERCP-guided transpapillary biliary drainage ERCP fails. TP failure can occur as a result of duodenal obstruction, failed cannulation, and failed wire access across the stricture.

Potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage include avoidance of pancreatitis and post-sphincterotomy bleeding. Additionally, it may result in a lower frequency of gastric outlet obstruction since the stent does not encroach upon the tumor.

To compare the potential advantages of EUS-guided biliary drainage the investigators are conducting a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the EUS-guided drainage to traditional ERCP.

This EUS-BD vs. ERCP-TP-trial (BILPAL) is a randomized controlled multicenter trial that will provide evidence whether or not traditional ERCP biliary drainage is to be performed in patients with obstruction in bile duct due to unresectable pancreatic head or periampullary tumor.

This study will enroll 120 subjects; 60 subjects in each arm. Trial duration is about 1 year and involves 5-7 visits.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
120
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Age between 18 and 90 years old
  2. Clinically indicated for biliary endoscopic drainage with Endoscopic Ultrasound guidance or ERCP
  3. CT scan has demonstrated a lesion in the pancreatic head area with metastases and/ or local tumor ingrowth preventing resection.
  4. CT with evidence of distant metastases or local tumor ingrowth into portal or mesenteric vessels (as defined by the tumor surrounding the vessel for at least 180 degrees of the circumference)
  5. A serum bilirubin level of > 2.5mg/dL at randomization
  6. Deemed surgically unresectable
  7. Consents to participation in the randomized controlled trial

Exclusion Criteria :

  1. > 90 years
  2. Severe comorbidity (Karnofsky <50%)
  3. Any prior successful previous biliary drainage including ERCP and stenting, percutaneous biliary and surgical,
  4. Prior surgically altered pancreaticobiliary or gastroduodenal anatomy.
  5. Female of childbearing potential with a positive pregnancy test prior to the procedure or intends to become pregnant during the study.
  6. Currently participating in another device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the endpoints of this study.
Read More
Exclusion Criteria

Not provided

Read More

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
ERCPERCPEndoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography with transpapillary biliary stent placement only.
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary DrainageEndoscopic Ultrasound Guided Biliary DrainageEndoscopic Ultrasound Guided biliary drainage with stent placement. EUS via either stomach or duodenum.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Efficacy of Stent Patency6 months after randomization

Efficacy is measure by the evaluation of biliary stent patency at month 6 post randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Quality of Life1 year from study enrollment

QOL will be measured via QLQ-C30 questionnaires completed by the subject at each follow up visit

Serum bilirubin decrease1 month from procedure

Duration to achieving at least 30% decrease in serum bilirubin or normalization of serum bilirubin level (≤1.2 mg/dL)

Safety evaluation: Assessment of number and frequency of procedure related adverse events within 1 month of the procedureWithin 1 month of procedure

Assessment of number and frequency of procedure related adverse events within 1 month of the procedure

Clinical Success1 month from procedure

Resolution of jaundice due to obstruction in the bile duct

Technical Success1 month from procedure

Technical success is defined as successful stent insertion providing biliary drainage with confirmation of appropriate radiographic positioning

Survival duration2 years from randomization

Survival duration will be measured from time of diagnosis to death

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Weill Cornell Medical College

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath