跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01863056
NCT01863056已完成不适用

The Effect of Sit-Stand Workstations on Physical Activity in Sedentary Office Workers: A Randomized Crossover Trial

University of Minnesota1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 29 人开始时间: 2012年1月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
29
试验地点
1
主要终点
non-exercise activity

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the installation of sit-stand work stations could lead to decreased sedentary time and increased physical activity during the workday among sedentary office workers.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •Mostly sedentary (sitting ≥ 4 hour) during the workday.
  • •Anticipated using a single computer workstation for 20 hours or more per week

排除标准

  • •Unable to stand for at least two hours per workday (two hours over the whole workday, not consecutively)
  • •Reported severe musculoskeletal symptoms, specifically lower extremity or lower back pain.
  • •Diagnosed with or under treatment for diabetes, heart disease, cancer, orthostatic hypertension, varicose vein, autoimmune disease, or other chronic diseases.
  • •Pregnant women

研究组 & 干预措施

Sit-Stand Desk

Experimental

Cross-over trial: so one group got the intervention in period 1 and didn't get the intervention in period 2 (serving as control for self in period 2) and the other group got the intervention in period 2 and didn't get the intervention in period 1 (serving as control for self in period 1).

干预措施: Sit-Stand Desk (Other)

Control

No Intervention

Used normal work desk which only allows working sitting down

结局指标

主要结局

non-exercise activity

时间窗: Measured constantly during the entire control period and measured constantly during the entire intervention period and the two periods were compared to determine change in non-exercise activity

Non-exercise activity was meausred by triple axis accelerometers during all waking hours in the control period (1 month) and in the intervention period (1 month). The two periods were then compared for each subject. Sitting time was also measured subjectively using a validated questionnaire: occupational sitting and physical activity questinnarie (OSPAQ) Hypothesis: Amount of time spent standing, walking, and other components of non-exercise activity will be higher during the standing intervention period relative to the control period (usual sitting).

次要结局

  • Individual Interviews to Qualitatively ascertain experience with Sit-Stand Desks(End of control period and end of intervention period)
  • Productivity Survey(Once a week for 4 weeks of control period and 4 weeks of intervention period and the two periods were compared)
  • Body composition and fitness(Beginning of control period, end of control period (4 weeks later), beginning of intervention period, and end of intervention period)
  • 24 hr Diet recall(Once a week for 4 weeks of control period and 4 weeks of intervention period and the two periods were compared)
  • Stress(Once every two weeks for 4 weeks of control period and 4 weeks of intervention period and the two periods were compared)
  • Ecological Momentary Assesment Fatigue, appetite, energy levels Sitting/standing, Fatigue, appetite, energy levels Self-administered web-based ecological momentary assessments(Twice per day during workdays (5 days a week) for 4 weeks of control period and 4 weeks of intervention period and the two periods were compared)
  • 24 hour Physical Activity Recall(Once a week for 4 weeks of control period and 4 weeks of intervention period and the two periods were compared)
  • Focus Group Sessions to Qualitatively ascertain experience with Sit-Stand Desks(End of Study)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验