MedPath

Effects of Serial Plotting on Fundal Height Charts on Identification and Outcomes of Small for Gestational Age Infants

Not Applicable
Conditions
Small for Gestational Age
Registration Number
NCT02964793
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Brief Summary

Fetal Growth Restriction (FGR) remains a challenging topic for clinicians, researchers and policy makers, and a central question is how to improve the performance of screening during pregnancy in order to provide appropriate care. The recent recommendations and reporting of French results have raised awareness of the need to improve growth screening in France. Based on the existing literature, the hypothesis is that a greater investment in growth monitoring based on a more rigorous interpretation of information available from routinely implemented clinical assessment and ultrasound will allow for significant gains in detection. The current context provides the opportunity to evaluate the application of a training program for serial plotting of Symphysis Fundal Height (SFH) and Estimated Fetal Weight (EFW) on customised charts. This intervention is consistent with French guidelines which support the monthly measurement of SFH, the use of Customised Fetal Weight Reference (CFWR), in particular for referral US (Ultrasound) examinations, and the longitudinal interpretation of growth. These guidelines were recently restated in the clinical practice recommendations issued by the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

The intervention tested in the trial will include training of professionals for standardization of SFH measurement, introduction of software, and recommendations for growth interpretation and referral examinations. Expected benefits are an increase in antenatal identification of growth restricted fetuses without an increase in the FP rate. Such a program will allow identified Small for Gestational Age (SGA) fetuses to receive appropriate antenatal care. This intervention could double the detection rate of SGA births from 20 to 40%, corresponding to 32 000 infants nationwide annually for whom antenatal care could be improved.

Main objective: To test the effectiveness of the serial plotting of SFH and EFW measures on customised percentile charts supported by provider training, versus standard antenatal care, to improve the detection of FGR. The aim of the investigators is to double rates of antenatal detection from 20 to 40% among SGA infants, defined as a birthweight under the 10th percentile for GA.

Detailed Description

Type of study Randomized cluster trial

Study objectives:

Main objective : To test the effectiveness of the serial plotting of SFH and EFW measures on customised percentile charts supported by provider training, versus standard antenatal care, to improve the detection of FGR. Our aim is to double rates of antenatal detection from 20 to 40% among SGA infants, defined as a birthweight under the 10th percentile for GA.

Secondary objectives: To measure the impact of screening program on:

1. Perinatal outcomes: stillbirths and neonatal morbidity and mortality including the risk of severe growth restriction (less than the 3rd percentile).

2. Rate of false positives and likelihood ratios of screening policies

3. Modes of onset of labor and of delivery

4. Resource use and costs : the number of antenatal visits and referrals for ultrasound examinations and their indications will be evaluated

Primary endpoint

Detection of FGR during pregnancy, defined as:

* The mention of suspected growth restriction in medical charts

* And either at least one referral for additional US for growth monitoring

* And/Or a provider indicated delivery for FGR among SGA births, defined as infants with a birthweight below the 10th centile of French CFWR.

Secondary endpoints

1. Perinatal outcomes: late fetal death, Apgar score\<7 at 5 min, pH\<7, resuscitation, severe growth restriction (less than the 3rd percentile), admission to a neonatal unit, neonatal convulsions, intra-ventricular hemorrhage, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, death during hospital stay

2. Rate of false positives (equal to 1-specificity), and likelihood ratios of screening policies and their 95% confidence interval. The rate of FP will be defined as suspected FGR among non-SGA births according to the CFWR.

3. Modes of onset of labor and of delivery: labor induction and indications, caesarean section and indications (including pre-labor caesarean and caesarean section after onset of labor), provider indicated delivery before 37 and before 39 weeks GA

4. Resource use and costs : number of antenatal visits, number of referrals for ultrasound examinations and mean number of US per woman, number of umbilical artery Doppler examinations

Inclusion criteria : Singleton pregnancy, Booking before or at 30 weeks GA in the maternity units , Delivery in the participating units Exclusion criteria : Terminations of pregnancy, Known fibroid uterus or uterine congenital malformations, Refusal to participate, Minor patient

HPAG is a cluster randomized trial involving 16 geographically dispersed French maternity units. In the maternity units randomized to the intervention group, a protocol of growth monitoring supported by prior training of healthcare professionals will be implemented for all pregnant women receiving antenatal care in the unit, whatever the GA or medical or obstetrical risk.

The intervention consists only in the standardization of current practices. Clinicians in the intervention maternity units will follow a standardized protocol, and will be asked to measure SFH at each antenatal appointment, collect EFW from the 3rd trimester US, report these values on the chart, and monitor fetal growth according to the protocol guidelines. Practices will remain unchanged in the control group.

After delivery, inclusion and exclusion criteria will be assessed by independent clinical research investigators, probably midwives. All SGA births and non-SGA births according to the French CFWR will be included to answer the main and secondary objectives.

Data collection will be carried out by the referent midwife. Recorded information will include the antenatal care provided, suspicion of FGR, labor and delivery modes, and neonatal outcomes until discharge home. The use of the intervention will also be assessed in the intervention maternity units by recording information on the presence and completeness of customised charts in the medical records.

Sites : 16 French maternity units

Duration : 24 months, including 6 months of inclusions

Number of participants : 10 000 births (625 per maternity unit)

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
10000
Inclusion Criteria

Mothers will be recruited after delivery if they fulfill the following criteria:

  • Have a singleton pregnancy
  • book before or at 30 weeks GA in the maternity units
  • and deliver in the participating unit
Exclusion Criteria
  • Terminations of pregnancy
  • Known fibroid uterus or uterine congenital malformations
  • Refusal to participate
  • Minor patient

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Rate detection of FGRat birth

The primary outcome will be the detection rate of FGR among SGA births, measured in each arm, defined as:

* suspected growth restriction mentioned in medical charts

* AND at least one referral for additional US for growth monitoring

* AND/OR a provider indicated delivery for FGR among the total number of SGA births, defined as infants with a birthweight below the 10th centile of French CFWR.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of participants presenting the following perinatal outcomesat birth

Perinatal outcomes:

* late fetal death,

* Apgar score\<7 at 5 min,

* pH\<7,

* resuscitation,

* severe growth restriction (less than the 3rd percentile),

* admission after birth,

* neonatal convulsions,

* intra-ventricular hemorrhage,

* hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy,

* death during hospital stay

Modes of onset of labor and of deliveryat birth

Modes of onset of labor and of delivery: labor induction and indications, caesarean section and indications (including pre-labor caesarean and caesarean section after onset of labor), provider indicated delivery before 37 and before 39 GA

Performances of screening policiesat birth

* Rate of false positives = equal to 1-specificity = 1 - (True negatives/non-SGA births), where True negatives correspond to non-suspected FGR, and its 95% Confidence Interval

* PLR (positive likelihood ratios = sensibility / (1 - specificity) and its 95% Confidence Interval

* NLR (negative likelihood ratios = (1 - sensibility) / specificity and its 95% Confidence Interval

Resource use and costsat birth

Impact of screening program on resource use and costs is characterized by :

* number of antenatal visits per woman,

* number of referrals for ultrasound examinations per woman

* number of umbilical artery Doppler examinations per woman

Trial Locations

Locations (16)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux

🇫🇷

Bordeaux, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Caen University Hospital, Caen

🇫🇷

Caen, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Louis Mourier Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP)

🇫🇷

Colombes, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Grenoble University Hospital

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Neonatal Care, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, University of Lille

🇫🇷

Lille, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North Hospital, Assistance Publique-Marseille Hospitals (APHM), Marseille

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cochin Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Port Royal

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Trousseau Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP)

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Robert Debré Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Paris

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Assistance Publique-Paris Hospitals (APHP), Kremlin-Bicêtre

🇫🇷

Paris, France

Scroll for more (6 remaining)
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France
loic sentilhes
Contact
05 56 79 56 79
loicsentilhes@hotmail.com
loic sentilhes, MD
Principal Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.