Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04403841
NCT04403841CompletedNot Applicable

Effect of Group Patient Education on Glycemic Control Among People Living With Type 2 Diabetes in Vietnam: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Hanoi Medical University1 site in 1 country405 target enrollmentStarted: August 1, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
405
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Disease awareness

Study Overview

Brief Summary

This study measures the effect of a 3-month patient education and self-management intervention in a low-resource setting, on diabetes knowledge and levels of blood glucose control.

Detailed Description

In Vietnam, there is a low level of diabetes knowledge among the general population, and significantly lower awareness in rural areas compared with urban areas. This highlights the urgent need for communication and education to improve the knowledge of the Vietnamese population of patients with type 2 diabetes on risk factors, complications, prevention and treatment. The main goal of this study is to evaluate the effects of a patient education and self-management intervention as add-on to usual diabetes care in a low-resource setting on diabetes knowledge and blood glucose control parameters in Vietnamese patients with type 2 diabetes.

This is a single-center, randomized, controlled study among adult out-patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria are randomly assigned to a community intervention or to usual diabetes care alone (control group) for a period of 3 months. The intervention consists of group education on type 2 diabetes, including, in addition to usual diabetes care: information on diet, exercise, drug therapy, and adherence. Each patient should attend the group education monthly over 3 consecutive months. Usual diabetes care is consistent with the ADA guidelines and comprises standard dietary and exercise advice in addition to antidiabetes treatment. Diabetes knowledge is measured with a modified Michigan University Diabetes Knowledge Test (MDKT). Other study outcomes includes change in mean HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, and systolic blood pressure.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
40 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes as defined above
  • •Aged 40-80 years old
  • •Ability to attend monthly clinic visits and signed informed consent
  • •All antidiabetes treatments were permitted including insulin

Exclusion Criteria

  • •A diagnosis of mental or neurological diseases that could interfere with the ability to comply with study procedures
  • •Pregnancy or lactation
  • •Known drug or alcohol dependence
  • •Requirement for a change in antidiabetes treatment over the study period

Arms & Interventions

Intervention

Other

The intervention of group education on type 2 diabetes, including, in addition to usual diabetes care

Intervention: patient education and self-management intervention in a low-resource setting on diabetes knowledge and levels of blood glucose control (Other)

Control

Other

Patients meeting the inclusion criteria assigned to usual diabetes care alone

Intervention: Usual diabetes care alone (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Disease awareness

Time Frame: 3-month

All patients complete a modified Michigan University Diabetes Knowledge Test (MDKT) (16) at baseline and at the end of the 3-month trial. The MDKT is a quick and low-cost method of assessing general knowledge of diabetes and diabetes self-care. The 23-item original questionnaire was translated into Vietnamese and adapted as required based on a pilot test performed in 10 people with type 2 diabetes, which resulted in one question being removed. The modified questionnaire therefore consist of 22 statements with multiple choice answers with 1 point awarded for each correct answer (Appendix 1). Patients who answer \>50% of the questions correctly considered to pass the knowledge test, and patients who answer \<50% of the questions correctly considered to fail. The proportion of successful patients (i.e. with MDKT total score ≥11) the study primary outcome.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Hanoi Medical University
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Ho Thi Kim Thanh

Associate Professor

Hanoi Medical University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials