TO KNOW WHICH HAS BETTER OUTCOME AMONG POLYVINYL CHLORIDE AND FLEXOMETALLIC ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE INSERTION THROUGH I-GEL

Not yet recruiting

Conditions: Postinfective and reactive arthropathies, (2) ICD-10 Condition: M843||Stress fracture, (3) ICD-10 Condition: N631||Unspecified lump in the right breast,

Registration Number: CTRI/2021/10/037646

Lead Sponsor: VSS Institute of Medical science and Research

Brief Summary: This study is to compare the outcome of polyvinylchloride endotracheal tube and flexometallic endotracheal tube insertion using i-gel as conduit in terms of efficacy, no of attempts and time taken for insertion.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: Not Yet Recruiting

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 92

Inclusion Criteria

ASA GRADE1and2, mallampati class 1and 2, weight-40-70 kgs, pt undergoing elective surgery under GA requiring ENDOTRACHEAL intubation.

Exclusion Criteria

Patient with anticipated difficult airway, mallampati grade 3and 4, obese patients, mouth opening<3 cm, patient with increased risk of muscle relaxant, contraindicated to use of muscle relaxant.

Study & Design

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
For ENDOTRACHEAL intubation using I-gel as conduit, poly vinyl chloride is better than FLEXOMETALLIC in terms of efficacy, first attempt success rate and time taken for insertion.	2years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Ease of insertion	2 years

Trial Locations

Locations (1): Vss institute of medical science and research
🇮🇳
Sambalpur, ORISSA, India
Vss institute of medical science and research
🇮🇳Sambalpur, ORISSA, India
Dr Preeti Jena
Principal investigator
8895614414
preetijena906@gmail.com