Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04963010
NCT04963010UnknownNot Applicable

Impact of Second Forward View Examination of the Proximal Colon on Adenoma Detection Rate

Zhu Xiaojia1 site in 1 country910 target enrollmentStarted: June 14, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
910
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
proximal colon adenoma detection rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To evaluate the impact of second forward view examination of the proximal colon on adenoma detection rate Inclusion criteria:Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing screening, follow-up monitoring, and diagnostic colonoscopy Exclusion criteria:①Cecal intubation failed. ②Have a history of colorectal surgery. ③Insufficient bowel preparation, inadequate bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS)scores < 2 in any segment of the colon). ④Inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal tuberculosis. ⑤Familial polyp syndrome. ⑥polyp retrieval failure. ⑦Patients with coagulation dysfunction.

Patients ≥ 18 years of age who came to our hospital's Digestive Endoscopy Center for screening, follow-up monitoring and diagnosis of colonoscopy. After successfully insert the cecum, colonoscope withdrawal to the splenic flexure, all polyps found during the withdrawal process were resection,then they were randomized to standard withdrawal colonoscopy or second forward view according to the random number table (1:1) to perform.

Detailed Description

Background:

Colonoscopy can reduce the incidence and mortality rates of colorectal cancer, and the reduction in distal colon cancer is more pronounced than proximal colon cancer. Compared with CRC found on screening, interphase CRC is more likely to occur in the proximal colon above the splenic flexure. Adenoma detection rate (ADR) is an important quality indicator of colonoscopy. Compared with ADR>20%,the incidence of interphase CRC is 10 times higher for endoscopists with ADR<20%. For every 1% increase in ADR, the risk of interphase CRC can be reduced by 3%, and fatal interphase CRC can be reduced by 5%. It is reported in the literature that the second forward view examination of the right colon (cecum, ascending colon, liver flexure) can significantly improve the right colon ADR, however, there is no report on the impact of second forward view examination of the proximal colon ADR (cecum, ascending colon, liver flexure, and transverse colon).

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of second forward view examination of the proximal colon on adenoma detection rate Inclusion criteria: Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing screening, follow-up monitoring, and diagnostic colonoscopy Exclusion criteria:

①Cecal intubation failed. ②Have a history of colorectal surgery. ③Insufficient bowel preparation, inadequate bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS)scores < 2 in any segment of the colon). ④Inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal tuberculosis. ⑤Familial polyp syndrome. ⑥polyp retrieval failure. ⑦Patients with coagulation dysfunction.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients ≥18 years of age undergoing screening, follow-up monitoring, and diagnostic colonoscopy -

Exclusion Criteria

  • ①Cecal intubation failed. ②Have a history of colorectal surgery. ③Insufficient bowel preparation, Boston Bowel Preparation Score (BBPS) <6 points. ④Inflammatory bowel disease or intestinal tuberculosis. ⑤Familial polyp syndrome. ⑥Recovery of polyp specimens failed, and no histopathological data. ⑦Patients with coagulation dysfunction.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

proximal colon adenoma detection rate

Time Frame: up to 2 years

proportion of patients with proximal colon adenoma found in all colonoscopy patients

Secondary Outcomes

  • proximal colon withdrawal time(up to 2 years)
  • BBPS(up to 2 years)
  • Cecal insertion time(up to 2 years)
  • whole colon adenoma detection rate(up to 2 years)
  • total withdrawal time(up to 2 years)
  • whole colon polyp detection rate(up to 2 years)
  • proximal colon polyp detection rate(up to 2 years)

Investigators

Sponsor
Zhu Xiaojia
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor Investigator
Principal Investigator

Zhu Xiaojia

Attending physician

Third People's Hospital of Jingdezhen City

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Impact of SFV of Proximal Colon on ADR | Clinical Trial