Grinding Versus Standard Methods for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis
- Conditions
- Bacterial Infection
- Interventions
- Biological: Biological sampling grindingBiological: Biological sampling with standard procedures
- Registration Number
- NCT02598141
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
- Brief Summary
The main objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability (sensitivity and specificity) of standard bacteriological analysis made from one or other of the two sampling processing techniques and perioperative management of samples : the Ultra Turrax method that uses grinding versus the standard method.
- Detailed Description
The secondary objectives of this study are to:
A. Compare the two techniques in terms of bacterial species identified.
B. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of analyzed samples (soft tissue, bone tissue) (subgroup analysis).
C. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of joint (subgroup analysis).
D. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of implanted materials (prosthesis versus other equipment) (subgroup analysis).
E. Develop a culture collection of bacteria isolated from infection osteo-articular protheses.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 122
- The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
- The patient is cared for in the operating theater because of a suspicion of an osteo-articular infection involving any type of material (protheses, screws, plates) and requiring bacteriological sampling
- The patient has not taken any antibiotics within the past 15 days
- The patient is participating in another study
- The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
- The patient is under judicial protection
- It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
- The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
- The subject presents with an osteo-articulaire infection without material
- Systematic samplings from reversals of aseptic prostheses
- Second intervention for the same patient
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Per-op biopsy around material Biological sampling grinding Patients included in this study require biopsies for suspicion of infected osteo-articular materials (implants, protheses, nails, screw, plates). Interventions: * Biological sampling grinding * Biological sampling with standard procedures Per-op biopsy around material Biological sampling with standard procedures Patients included in this study require biopsies for suspicion of infected osteo-articular materials (implants, protheses, nails, screw, plates). Interventions: * Biological sampling grinding * Biological sampling with standard procedures
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Presence/absence of an osteo-articular infection according to sample that underwent standard treatment Baseline Presence/absence of an osteo-articular infection according to sample that underwent Ultra Turrax® grinding Baseline
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Identification of bacterial species Baseline
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau
🇫🇷Nîmes Cedex 09, France