MedPath

Grinding Versus Standard Methods for the Treatment of Per-operative Bacteriological Samples Associated With Osteo-articular Sepsis

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bacterial Infection
Interventions
Biological: Biological sampling grinding
Biological: Biological sampling with standard procedures
Registration Number
NCT02598141
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
Brief Summary

The main objective of this study was to compare the diagnostic capability (sensitivity and specificity) of standard bacteriological analysis made from one or other of the two sampling processing techniques and perioperative management of samples : the Ultra Turrax method that uses grinding versus the standard method.

Detailed Description

The secondary objectives of this study are to:

A. Compare the two techniques in terms of bacterial species identified.

B. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of analyzed samples (soft tissue, bone tissue) (subgroup analysis).

C. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of joint (subgroup analysis).

D. Compare the diagnostic capabilities (sensitivity and specificity) of the two sample processing techniques depending on the type of implanted materials (prosthesis versus other equipment) (subgroup analysis).

E. Develop a culture collection of bacteria isolated from infection osteo-articular protheses.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
122
Inclusion Criteria
  • The patient must be insured or beneficiary of a health insurance plan
  • The patient is cared for in the operating theater because of a suspicion of an osteo-articular infection involving any type of material (protheses, screws, plates) and requiring bacteriological sampling
  • The patient has not taken any antibiotics within the past 15 days
Exclusion Criteria
  • The patient is participating in another study
  • The patient is in an exclusion period determined by a previous study
  • The patient is under judicial protection
  • It is impossible to correctly inform the patient
  • The patient is pregnant, parturient, or breastfeeding
  • The subject presents with an osteo-articulaire infection without material
  • Systematic samplings from reversals of aseptic prostheses
  • Second intervention for the same patient

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Per-op biopsy around materialBiological sampling grindingPatients included in this study require biopsies for suspicion of infected osteo-articular materials (implants, protheses, nails, screw, plates). Interventions: * Biological sampling grinding * Biological sampling with standard procedures
Per-op biopsy around materialBiological sampling with standard proceduresPatients included in this study require biopsies for suspicion of infected osteo-articular materials (implants, protheses, nails, screw, plates). Interventions: * Biological sampling grinding * Biological sampling with standard procedures
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Presence/absence of an osteo-articular infection according to sample that underwent standard treatmentBaseline
Presence/absence of an osteo-articular infection according to sample that underwent Ultra Turrax® grindingBaseline
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Identification of bacterial speciesBaseline

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

CHRU de Nîmes - Hôpital Universitaire Carémeau

🇫🇷

Nîmes Cedex 09, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath