跳至主要内容
临床试验/NL-OMON54699
NL-OMON54699已完成不适用

Compare Absorb ABSORB bioresorbable scaffold vs. Xience metallic stent for prevention of restenosis following percutaneous coronary intervention in patients at high risk of restenosis. ;Annex study of in-stent restenosis COMPARE ABSORB ISR study: A single-arm, annex study of patients with in-DES restenotic lesions requiring PCI and treated with Absorb BVS - Compare Absorb, Compare Absorb ISR

Maasstadziekenhuis0 个研究点目标入组 460 人开始时间: 待定最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
460

研究概览

简要总结

暂无简介。

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 至 99(—)

入选标准

  • Patients (18-80 years old) with at least one of the following:
  • i) High-risk characteristics for restenosis
  • Medically treated Diabetes and/or multivessel disease of which more than one
  • de-novo target lesion to be treated with the study scaffold/stent
  • ii) Complex target lesion
  • Single de-novo target lesion satisfying at least one of the following:
  • Lesion length >28 mm
  • Small vessels: Target lesion reference vessel diameter between 2.5-2.75 mm
  • Lesion with pre-existing total occlusion (pre-procedural TIMI = 0)
  • *Pre-existing* occlusion is supposed to be present before procedure and does
  • not include the culprit lesion in the setting of acute myocardial infarction.
  • Bifurcation with single stent strategy
  • Patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) of a drug-eluting stent are admitted to
  • a separate annex study protocol: Compare Absorb ISR, Inclusion criteria
  • Diabetic substudy
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • All other general inclusion criteria according to Compare Absorb main study
  • eligibility criteria., inclusion / exclusion criteria Smart Follow up substudy
  • - As same as the the Compare Absorb main study, Inclusion criteria in-stent
  • restenosis annex study Compare Absorb ISR
  • Patients who are excluded from the main Compare Absorb randomised study, due
  • to the presence of in-DES restenosis
  • Patients aged 18-80 years
  • high risk of restenosis due to the presence of up to two in-DES restenosis
  • lesions in one or two different epicardial vessels that could be treated with
  • Absorb scaffold(s)

排除标准

  • Age <18 years or >75 years
  • Renal insufficiency (GFR/MDRD <45 ml/min)
  • Known comorbidities which make patients unable to complete 5-year follow-up
  • Known non-adherence to DAPT
  • Patients on oral anticoagulation
  • Cardiogenic Shock (Killip >2)
  • LVEF <30%
  • * Patients at high bleeding risk who are not suitable for long-term DAPT
  • * Pregnant woman
  • Following lesion characteristics:
  • --Target lesion reference vessel diameter (RVD) < 2.5 and > 4 mm
  • --STEMI with RVD of >3.5mm of the culprit target lesion
  • --Target lesion with in-stent/scaffold thrombosis
  • --Graft lesions as target lesions
  • --Aorto-ostial lesion(s)
  • --Left main lesion
  • --Severe tortuosity of target vessel
  • --In-scaffold/in-stent restenosis
  • --Bifurcation target lesion with intended 2 stent/scaffold strategy,
  • Exclusion criteria Diabetic sub-study are the same as for the main study,
  • Exclusion criteria in-stent restenosis annex study Compare Absorb ISR
  • Similar to the main Compare Absorb study except for the exclusion for
  • in-stent restenosis
  • Additional lesion exclusion criteria:
  • Bare metal stent restenosis requiring intervention in the target vessel(s)
  • Initial DES size of < 2.5 mm, or in the absence of information on previous
  • DES size, target vessel diameter < 2.5 mm
  • Previous 2 stent technique in the target lesion if it is a bifurcation lesion
  • Recurrent in-DES restenosis in the target vessel
  • More than one layer of metallic DES/BMS at the target lesion site
  • Non-target lesion and target lesion in the same epicardial coronary artery
  • (right coronary artery, left circumflex artery or left anterior descending

研究者

发起方
Maasstadziekenhuis

相似试验