Comparing Three Supraglottic Airway Devices in adult patients undergoing General Anesthesia
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: D249- Benign neoplasm of unspecified breastHealth Condition 2: O- Medical and SurgicalHealth Condition 3: K358- Other and unspecified acute appendicitisHealth Condition 4: K429- Umbilical hernia without obstruction or gangrene
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/11/060186
- Lead Sponsor
- Sardar Patel Medical Collage Bikaner Rajasthan
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Completed
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 100
Inclusion Criteria
ASA category I and II, undergoing any type of surgery in supine position under general Anesthesia be included in the study after getting informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria
Patient refusal to give consent, Patients with anticipated difficult airway, having upper respiratory tract infection, patients at risk of gastroesophageal regurgitation, history of upper gastrointestinal surgery, adults having limited mouth opening and mass in pharyngeal/laryngeal cavity will be excluded from the study. The patients in whom the insertion was not successful even after three attempts will get excluded from the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the Fiberoptic view and the Oropharyngeal leak pressure between I-gel, Ambu Auragain and Baska Mask after insertionTimepoint: To compare the Fiberoptic view and the Oropharyngeal leak pressure between I-gel, Ambu Auragain and Baska Mask after 5 minutes of insertion
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the number of attempts, Ease of insertion, Complications between I-gel, Ambu Auragain and Baska MaskTimepoint: Till the point of insertion of second and third generation of supraglottic airway devices