Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06016374
NCT06016374UnknownNot Applicable

Development and Validation of a Structured Tele-rehabilitation Programme to Improve the Treatment of Brain Injured Patients

Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain2 sites in 1 country50 target enrollmentStarted: February 21, 2023Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Sponsor
Enrollment
50
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
usability

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The goal of this research project is to develop a tele-rehabilitation programme, which will constitute an original care pathway for brain damaged patients. It will aim to improve their impairments, activities and social participation. The programme will deliver a therapeutic education and self-education programme targeting the upper and lower limbs, and will assess the patients by means of a diary and self-evaluation questionnaires.

Detailed Description

According to WHO (1997), telemedicine is defined as "the part of medicine that uses the transmission of medical information (images, reports, recordings, etc.) by telecommunication, with a view to obtaining at a distance a diagnosis, a specialised opinioń, continuous monitoring of a patient, a therapeutic decision". More specifically, tele-rehabilitation is defined as "a set of interventions carried out at a distance and using communication technologies and information services, with the aim of improving the health or well-being of the persons involved". In other words, tele-rehabilitation is a form of health care practice that uses information and communication technologies to exchange information between rehabilitation providers and patients.

Tele-rehabilitation programmes typically include self-rehabilitation. Self-rehabilitation consists of a personalised therapeutic programme during which the patient performs rehabilitation exercises independently. The patient is supervised by a clinician (e.g. physiotherapist or occupational therapist) throughout the programme. Initially to explain the programme and teach the patient how to use the technology. Then, to coach them regularly. Tele-rehabilitation programmes can be delivered in hospitals, rehabilitation centres or at home.

Stroke affects 19,000 people per year in Belgium and is the leading cause of acquired disability in adults in industrialised countries. After a stroke, patients recover some of their functional abilities through spontaneous recovery. Rehabilitation improves this functional recovery, in terms of impairments, but especially in terms of activities and social participation, according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. This rehabilitation must be intense, early and interdisciplinary, to promote cerebral neuroplasticity. However, more than half of these patients retain sequelae in terms of locomotion or function of the paretic upper limb.

Current literature indicates that functional rehabilitation after stroke can be further optimised. On the one hand, current recommendations show that rehabilitation should be intensive and task-oriented to promote brain neuroplasticity and motor relearning. Currently, the intensity of treatment is generally insufficient in both the acute and chronic phases and may vary depending on the management setting. In Belgium, patients typically receive 2 hours of rehabilitation per working day in the acute and subacute phasë, and 30 minutes in the chronic phase. These patients are therefore globally not active enough.

On the other hand, complementary treatments to classical rehabilitation have shown their effectiveness in recent years. Thus, several scientific publications have shown that tele-rehabilitation, which mainly includes remotely supervised self-rehabilitation programmes, is effective in improving impairments and activities in people who have had a stroke, either as a complement or a substitute for conventional rehabilitation. In 2018, Tchéro et al. showed that tele-rehabilitation was comparable in effectiveness to conventional treatments. A recent Cochrane review also showed that tele-rehabilitation was as effective as standard care, with a low to moderate level of evidence, on independence in daily activities, balance or quality of life. In addition to being able to intensify treatment, tele-rehabilitation is inexpensive and can also facilitate access to care for patients who do not have a physiotherapy practice or rehabilitation centre in their immediate vicinity.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Other
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Present with an acute, subacute or chronic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke,
  • Be at least 18 years old,
  • To be hospitalised in the neurorehabilitation unit.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Other neurological or musculoskeletal disease limiting their functional capacities,
  • Pain in the upper limb making it impossible to mobilise.
  • Inadaptability of the device to the patient's physiological position, especially in cases of contracture or severe spasticity.
  • Severe cognitive disorders preventing the understanding of instructions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

usability

Time Frame: The test will be administered only once at the end of the intervention. So, 4 weeks after the start of the experiment, during the last session.

At the end of the trial, subjects will complete the System Usability Scale (SUS), a ten-item questionnaire evaluated on a Likert scale. This questionnaire is used to assess the usability of the TéléRé program. The participant's scores for each question are converted to a new number, added together and then multiplied by 2.5 to convert the original scores of 0-40 to 0-100. Though the scores are 0-100, these are not percentages and should be considered only in terms of their percentile ranking. Based on research, a SUS score above a 68 would be considered above average and anything below 68 is below average, however the best way to interpret your results involves "normalizing" the scores to produce a percentile ranking. It consists of a 10 item questionnaire with five response options for respondents; from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Cliniques universitaires Saint-Luc- Université Catholique de Louvain
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Development and Validation of a Structured... | Clinical Trial