MedPath

Efficacy and Fafety of Low-volume Preparation in the Elderly: (EASY PREP) study

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Not Applicable
Registration Number
KCT0004539
Lead Sponsor
Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong
Brief Summary

Background and study aims: 1L-polyethylene glycol (PEG)/Ascorbic acid (Asc) was developed and intended to increase osmotic load by containing a greater quantity of ascorbate components and to be less volume requesting to drink. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability and safety of 1LPEG/Asc versus 2L-PEG/Asc with a split-dosing regimen in elderly patients undergoing scheduled colonoscopy. Patients and methods: This was a prospective, non-inferiority, randomized, investigator-blinded, and multicenter study conducted in Korea between July 2019 and December 2020. Patients aged between 65 and 85 years were randomized to either 1L-PEG/Asc or 2L-PEG/Asc with split dose regimen at a 1:1 ratio. The efficacy of bowel preparation was evaluated using the Harefield Cleansing Scale (HCS) and the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results: A total of 202 patients were analyzed. Successful overall bowel preparation is similar between 1L-PEG/Asc and 2L-PEG/Asc based on HCS (95.1% vs 93.1%, P = 0.528) and BBPS (93.1% vs 90.0%, P = 0.422). The perfect overall bowel preparation in 1L-PEG/Asc was higher than that in 2L-PEG/Asc with HCS (40.2% vs 25.0%, P = 0.021) and BBPS (80.4% vs 68.0%, P = 0.044). 1L-PEG/Asc demonstrated superior high-quality preparation in right colon (46.1% vs 30.0% on HCS; P = 0.019, 83.3% vs 70.0% on BBPS; P = 0.025). Adenoma detection rate (47.1% vs 49.0%, P = 0.782), occurrence of adverse events (25.5% vs 23.0%, P = 0.680), laboratory shifts, and tolerability were comparable between two groups. Conclusions: 1L-PEG/Asc was overall as effective, safe, and tolerable as 2L-PEG/Asc in elderly patients with comorbidities.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
202
Inclusion Criteria

Patients undergoing colonoscopy aged 65-84 who agreed to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

? People who have had a colon resection
? Patients with congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction within 6 months
? American Society of Anesthesiology class III or above
? If you have a history of cirrhosis, ascites, chronic kidney disease, inflammatory growth disease, serious inflammatory diseases
? Those who complain of severe constipation (less than 3 times a week, those taking regular laxatives)
? Disabled people (cognitive and intellectual disabilities), pregnant women
? Paralysis, intestinal obstruction, toxic giant colon
? Patient who refused to sign the consent form

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional Study
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adequate bowel preparation rate using Boston bowel preparation scale(BBPS)
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
adequate bowel preparation rate using Harefield cleansing scale (HCS);compliance;easiness;safety;adenoma detection rate;polyp detection rate
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath