Ultrasonography Versus Fluoroscopic Guided Renal Access
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Sponsor
- Assiut University
- Enrollment
- 100
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- duration of operation
Study Overview
Brief Summary
this present study is to compare the result of fluoroscopy, ultrasonography (US) in the guidance of percutaneous nephrostomy pcn .
Detailed Description
investigators will enroll 100 patients who are candidates for PCN in the study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two patient groups (group 1, US-guided approach , group 2, fluoroscopy-guided approach.The end point of the study is the comparison of outcome of procedure including stone free rate, transfusion rate, operation time, access time, length of stay and complications.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Treatment
- Masking
- Single (Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 6 Years to 90 Years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •infected hydronephrotic kidney onen's grade 2-3
- •obstructed good cortex with backpressure changes onen's grade 2-3 .
- •Evaluation of function of asymptomatic hydronephrotic kidney thin cortex onen's grade 4
Exclusion Criteria
- •congenital anomalies of kidney
- •patient underwent transplant or urinary diversion
- •solitary kidney
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
duration of operation
Time Frame: withen the operation
time taken from patient putted on table until end of operation
Duration of puncture
Time Frame: Within the operation
The time taken for make a puncture
Rate of success
Time Frame: withen the operation
the rate success of intervention by u/s or by fluoroscopy
Secondary Outcomes
- rate of Perioperative complication(withen the operation)
- Haemoglobin concentration change(24 hours post procedure)
Investigators
mostafa kamel abdel rahman abdel aal
Assistant lecturer
Assiut University