SAMBA EU Femoropopliteal Trial
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Peripheral Vascular Disease
- Registration Number
- NCT01139177
- Lead Sponsor
- NovoStent Corporation
- Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of the SAMBA Stent and Delivery System in the treatment of femoropopliteal lesions.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 39
Inclusion Criteria
Screening
- Patient must be ≥ 21 years of age with life expectancy > 1 year.
- Symptomatic leg ischemia requiring treatment of the superficial femoral and/or popliteal artery (Rutherford category 2-4; claudication, rest pain).
- Patient must be a suitable candidate for PTA and stenting.
- Patient is willing and able to return to the site of the investigation at the specified study intervals and undergo follow-up requirements.
- The patient or legal representative has provided written informed consent using a form that is reviewed and approved by the EC for the Clinical Site.
Pre-Intervention
- Target lesion has ≥ 50% stenosis as demonstrated angiographically.
- Lesion length ≤ 15 cm.
- Reference vessel diameter of 5 to 6 mm.
- Patient has at least 1 vessel run-off prior to treatment.
Exclusion Criteria
Screening
- The subject is pregnant or will become pregnant during the study or has any other condition that would preclude having x-rays. (Pre-menopausal women must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of the procedure.)
- Patients who have experienced a cardiovascular accident (CVA) or a myocardial infarction (MI) within 3 months prior to the procedure.
- Subject has had or plans to have a surgical or interventional procedure within 30 days before or after the implantation procedure of the SAMBA Stent.
- Existing hemorrhagic disease or coagulation problems or inability to take dual anti-platelet therapy.
- Contrast allergy that cannot be corrected with medication (e.g. steroids, etc.).
- Subject has other medical, social, or psychological problems that, in the opinion of the investigator, preclude them from receiving this treatment and the procedures and evaluations pre- and post-treatment.
- Patient is currently participating in another investigational drug or device study.
Pre-Intervention
- Uncorrectable severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease or severe common femoral artery stenosis preventing access or limiting inflow (e.g., stenosis greater than 50%).
- Uncorrectable occlusive disease limiting outflow (e.g., stenosis greater than 50%)
- Patients with previous surgery in the target vessel or stent that will be closer than 2 cm to either edge of SAMBA Stent(s).
- Lack of 1 cm of healthy vessel proximal to proximal target
- Lack of popliteal reconstitution (at least 2 cm of normal distal popliteal).
- Inability to cross the lesion with a guidewire.
- More than 1 lesion in the same limb requiring treatment that will not be covered by continuous stenting.
- Unsuccessful balloon pre-dilation (i.e., the residual stenosis is greater than 30%).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- SINGLE_GROUP
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The primary safety endpoint is defined as freedom from all cause death, unplanned index limb amputation, and target lesion revascularization. through 30 days The primary efficacy endpoint is defined as stent patency via Color Duplex Ultrasound (Peak Velocity Ratio ≤ 2.5). 3 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinically-Driven Target Lesion Revascularization (i.e., with documented preintervention evidence of at least 50% diameter stenosis (quantitative angiographic ≥ 50% or PSVR > 2.5). 12 months Change in Rutherford Classification compared to pre-implant. 12 months Stent Patency via Color Duplex Ultrasound (Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio ≤ 2.5). 12 months Stent Fractures. 12 months
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms by which the SAMBA Stent improves patency in femoropopliteal atherosclerosis?
How does the SAMBA Stent compare to drug-eluting balloons in treating peripheral vascular disease outcomes?
Which biomarkers correlate with long-term success of SAMBA Stent therapy in PAD patients?
What adverse events are associated with nitinol stent placement in femoral artery interventions?
Are there combination therapies with SAMBA Stent that enhance revascularization in critical limb ischemia?
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Herz Zentrum Bad Krozingen
🇩🇪Bad Krozingen, Germany
Herz-Zentrum Leipzig
🇩🇪Leipzig, Germany
Herz Zentrum Bad Krozingen🇩🇪Bad Krozingen, Germany