Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06682559
NCT06682559Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Comparison of Two Different Healing Abutments in Single Posterior Implants: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Alexandria University1 site in 1 country24 target enrollmentStarted: November 1, 2024Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
24
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment.

Detailed Description

Volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months of the use of a prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg with convex emergence profile in comparison to customized healing abutment with concave emergence profile.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Statistician

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients who are classified as ASA I or II physical status and require mandibular single implants (single missing mandibular posterior teeth) with:
  • Proper bone height and width.
  • Adequate zone of keratinized tissue (at least 2 mm)

Exclusion Criteria

  • Any systematic disease as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or metabolic bone diseases
  • Pregnancy and Lactation
  • A history of head and neck radiation treatment.
  • Chronic periodontal diseases.
  • Poor oral hygiene (Silness-Löe plaque index score 2 and 3)
  • Parafunctional habits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Measurement of peri-implant soft tissues volume

Time Frame: 3 months

Each participant will undergo volumetric analysis of peri-implant soft tissues after 3 months healing either after using prefabricated healing abutment with scan peg in comparison to customized healing abutment using a 3D meteorology software (GOM inspect). It will be measured in millimeter cube

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rania Elsayed

Principal investigator

Alexandria University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Comparison Between Two Different Healing... | Clinical Trial