跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01682707
NCT01682707已完成4 期

Randomized Clinical Trials to Compare the Hemodynamic Response During Intubation Between Rigid Laryngoscopy and Track Light in Coronary Patients Undergoing CABG

Federal University of Juiz de Fora1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2010年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
试验地点
1
主要终点
hemodynamic response

研究概览

简要总结

Opioids provide greater patient comfort during intubation, but are not able to abolish completely the release adrenergic hormones during the laryngoscopy, which may cause undesirable hemodynamic changes.

In this study the investigators selected two techniques commonly used for intubation, laryngoscopy and track light, so the investigators can verify which intubation techniques provides less hemodynamic changes in coronary patients under standard anesthesia induction.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 70 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •coronary disease ASA 2 e 3 using beta-blockers

排除标准

  • •emergency surgery arrythmia other antiarrythmic drugs

研究组 & 干预措施

Track Light

Active Comparator

干预措施: track light (Procedure)

Laryngoscopy

Active Comparator

Laryngoscopy Track Light teaqueal intubation

干预措施: laryngoscopy (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

hemodynamic response

时间窗: patient prepare (baseline), 1min after induction, 5 min after induction, 1 min after intubation

tracheal intubation with track light release less adrenergic hormones than laryngoscopy intubation

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Federal University of Juiz de Fora
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Marcello F Salgado Filho, MD

Master

Federal University of Juiz de Fora

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验