to Compare Two Well Popularized Methods of Inferior Nasal Turbinectomy
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Bilateral Inferior Turbinates Hypertrophy
- Sponsor
- Soroka University Medical Center
- Enrollment
- 50
- Primary Endpoint
- quality of life
- Last Updated
- 18 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy to blunt turbinectomy in terms of subjective and objective parameters.
Detailed Description
The two methods of nasal inferior turbinectomy are well popularized and in use for long periods of time. Endoscopic submucosal inferior turbinectomy is performed in our hospital and blunt turbinectomy is performed usually in privat clinics outside the hospital where there is no endoscopic equipment. We will examine both subjective (QOL questionaire) and objective parameters(rhinomanometry- a non invasive method to evaluate nasal airflow, saccharine test, nasal endoscopy) in our comparison of the outcome of these two methods.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •all patients above 18 years
Exclusion Criteria
- •can not answer a written questionaire
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
quality of life
Time Frame: 1 year
Secondary Outcomes
- rhinomanometry, saccharine test, nasal endoscopy(1 year)